From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
song@kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] livepatch: Fix NULL pointer dereference in klp_find_func()
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:03:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajvHlaZN7UUgE0Rm@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2606231015110.1711@pobox.suse.cz>
On Tue 2026-06-23 10:20:38, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > > Anyway, could you send the fix separately since it is an existing issue,
> > > please?
> >
> > Does the following change look good to you ?
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > index 28d15ba58a26..317a3c866c76 100644
> > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > @@ -799,9 +799,6 @@ void klp_free_replaced_patches_async(struct
> > klp_patch *new_patch)
> >
> > static int klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func)
> > {
> > - if (!func->old_name)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > /*
> > * NOPs get the address later. The patched module must be loaded,
> > * see klp_init_object_loaded().
> > @@ -1107,8 +1104,9 @@ static int __klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
> > */
> > int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > struct klp_object *obj;
> > + struct klp_func *func;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (!patch || !patch->mod || !patch->objs)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -1116,9 +1114,12 @@ int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
> > klp_for_each_object_static(patch, obj) {
> > if (!obj->funcs)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + klp_for_each_func_static(obj, func) {
> > + if (!func->old_name)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > -
> > if (!is_livepatch_module(patch->mod)) {
> > pr_err("module %s is not marked as a livepatch module\n",
> > patch->mod->name);
>
> If you wrap it into klp_check_patch() which Petr proposed alongside
> with all the checks at the beginning of klp_enable_patch() up to
> is_livepatch_module(), then yes, I think.
+1
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-07 13:16 [PATCH v3 0/7] livepatch: Introduce replace set support Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] livepatch: Fix NULL pointer dereference in klp_find_func() Yafang Shao
2026-06-09 13:27 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-10 3:00 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-22 14:21 ` Miroslav Benes
2026-06-23 6:50 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-23 8:20 ` Miroslav Benes
2026-06-24 12:03 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] livepatch: Move klp_find_func() into core.h Yafang Shao
2026-06-09 15:28 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-10 3:01 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] livepatch: Support scoped atomic replace using replace_set Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 14:00 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-09 16:00 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-10 3:24 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-10 9:48 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-11 12:58 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-15 12:30 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-16 2:41 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-16 20:15 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-17 2:40 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-17 14:54 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-18 9:20 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-17 13:52 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-17 20:06 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-18 2:34 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-18 13:03 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-22 17:26 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-23 3:08 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-23 15:38 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-10 14:45 ` code review: was: " Petr Mladek
2026-06-11 3:06 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-16 18:20 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-23 9:40 ` Miroslav Benes
2026-06-24 13:56 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-24 14:05 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] livepatch: Deprecate stack_order Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:11 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-11 3:21 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-16 18:44 ` Joe Lawrence
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] selftests/livepatch: Update tests for replace_set Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] selftests/livepatch: Add test for state ID conflict across replace_sets Yafang Shao
2026-06-12 8:55 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-15 11:59 ` Yafang Shao
2026-06-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] selftests/livepatch: Add test for function " Yafang Shao
2026-06-16 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] livepatch: Introduce replace set support Joe Lawrence
2026-06-17 2:21 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajvHlaZN7UUgE0Rm@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox