The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jeff millar" <wa1hco@adelphia.net>
To: "Shane Helms" <shanehelms@eircom.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:27:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c301c29bf5$201a9120$6a01a8c0@wa1hco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200212041526.57501.shanehelms@eircom.net

My opinion...

Kernels are getting mature in the sense the there's not that many ways to do
tasking and hardware interface.  It no longer a game of invention but a game
of polishing.  The amount of total work available probably continues to go
up because kernels are becoming as common as screws.

It's like the guy who invented interchangable hardware in the
1700's...really cool and creates plenty of work but it's no longer bleeding
edge to design the next screw thread in the next material.

So, do you want to push the edge and discover new principles and go where no
one has gone before?  Or do you want to make the existing implementations
better than anyone else ever has before?

If you want to stay with programming close to the hardware, think about
pulling the essential elements of I/O drivers and some parts of applications
into VHDL and programmable hardware (FPGA's)...then hook those into the
kernel effectively and in an open architecture sort of way.

jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Helms" <shanehelms@eircom.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:26 AM
Subject: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???


> I'd like most of you to answer the following question, that includes even
> Linus.
>
> I love C programming at low level (ie kernel, embedded, etc) and i'm
seriously
> good at it. But don't know whether I should persue it as my main Career or
> just as an Interest. My question is, is there, yet, any area at this low
> level to be discovered and developed on ? or as most ppl say, are the
> interesting parts over and it's just now into patches, bugs and slight
> enhancements/optimizations/securities ?
>
> I'm starting a Post-Graduate studies at April, and need to know, whether
it's
> worth going into Computer Architecture Group as my main career, or shall I
> stir towards a another area like networking which is still in
developement,
> and plenty of jobs (but not as interssting as kernel/OS programming) ?????

>
> please reply, and if in favor of kernel developement, try to name some
areas
> where there yet relies hope.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shane
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-05  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-03 13:03 cs driver SANTHOSH K
2002-12-04 15:26 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Shane Helms
2002-12-04 17:01   ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-04 18:38     ` Alan Cox
2002-12-04 18:07       ` Richard B. Tilley  (Brad)
2002-12-04 18:21         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-04 18:39           ` Erik Andersen
2002-12-05 16:59           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-05  0:27   ` jeff millar [this message]
2002-12-05 23:55     ` Frank van Maarseveen
2002-12-06  0:24       ` Shane Helms
2002-12-06  3:00       ` jeff millar
2002-12-06  3:36         ` Miles Bader
2002-12-06  8:55         ` Helge Hafting
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-05  2:00 Ed Vance
2002-12-05 12:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 12:54   ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 13:15     ` Andreas Schwab
2002-12-05 18:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 19:52       ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 20:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-07 20:34       ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-05 18:09     ` Alan Cox
2002-12-05 17:47       ` yodaiken
2002-12-05 19:08       ` John Bradford
2002-12-06  6:15       ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06  6:30         ` John Alvord
2002-12-06  9:48         ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-07 20:43           ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-07 20:39       ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-09 14:08         ` Jesse Pollard
2002-12-10  0:26           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 14:33   ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-05 14:58 Nicholas Berry
     [not found] <sdef2367.029@mail-02.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 15:17 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 15:38   ` Dave Jones
2002-12-05 15:44   ` Eric Weigle
     [not found] <sdef301b.011@mail-01.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 16:36 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06  3:29   ` Keith Adamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c301c29bf5$201a9120$6a01a8c0@wa1hco' \
    --to=wa1hco@adelphia.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shanehelms@eircom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox