From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh <abuehaze@amazon.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Small cleanup to sched_balance_newidle()
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:58:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01dcb63e-9ebd-42ca-9418-a822bf081bfc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112150818.GG4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 11/12/25 8:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 03:42:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>> if sd is null, i think we are skipping these compared to earlier.
>>>
>>> t0 = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu);
>>> sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
>>
>> let me pull that sched_balance_update_blocked_averages() thing up a few
>> lines.
>
> Something like so..
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9946,15 +9946,11 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct
> }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>
> -static void sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
> +static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
> {
> bool decayed = false, done = true;
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> - struct rq_flags rf;
>
> - rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
> update_blocked_load_tick(rq);
> - update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
> decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
> @@ -9962,7 +9958,15 @@ static void sched_balance_update_blocked
> update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> if (decayed)
> cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
> - rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
> +}
> +
> +static void sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
> + guard(rq_lock_irqsave)(rq);
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
> + __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(rq);
> }
>
> /********** Helpers for sched_balance_find_src_group ************************/
> @@ -12865,6 +12869,8 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct
> if (!cpu_active(this_cpu))
> return 0;
>
> + __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(this_rq);
> +
is this done only when sd == null ?
> /*
> * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked
> * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding
> @@ -12891,7 +12897,6 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct
> raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
>
> t0 = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu);
> - sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
Referring to commit,
9d783c8dd112a (sched/fair: Skip update_blocked_averages if we are defering load balance)
I think vincent added the max_newidle_lb_cost check since sched_balance_update_blocked_averages is costly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 16:06 [PATCH 0/4] sched: The newidle balance regression Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Revert max_newidle_lb_cost bump Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-14 12:19 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-17 16:23 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Small cleanup to sched_balance_newidle() Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-10 13:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-11-10 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-12 14:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-12 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-12 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-12 15:28 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-11-14 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-14 10:22 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-11-14 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-14 13:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-11-14 12:19 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-17 16:23 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 16:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Small cleanup to update_newidle_cost() Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-14 12:19 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-17 16:23 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Proportional newidle balance Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-10 13:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-11-11 9:07 ` Adam Li
2025-11-11 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-12 12:04 ` Adam Li
2025-11-12 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-12 15:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-14 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-14 12:18 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-17 16:23 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-18 20:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Mario Roy
2026-01-23 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-23 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-23 12:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-28 4:08 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-27 4:15 ` Mario Roy
2026-01-27 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-27 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-30 1:44 ` Mario Roy
2026-01-30 4:14 ` Mario Roy
2026-02-24 9:13 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: More complex proportional " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-25 12:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Proportional " Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-01-27 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-28 15:48 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-01-29 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-29 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-30 16:12 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-01-30 13:16 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-02-02 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 11:07 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-02-04 12:45 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-02-04 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-04 13:59 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-02-04 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-04 22:48 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-01-27 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-27 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-28 16:24 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-01-28 16:03 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2026-04-29 8:51 ` Qing Wang
2026-05-06 2:44 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Replace random newidle_balance with Bresenham accumulator Qing Wang
2025-11-10 19:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: The newidle balance regression Chris Mason
2025-11-11 19:08 ` Josh Don
2025-11-12 21:59 ` Chris Mason
2025-11-14 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01dcb63e-9ebd-42ca-9418-a822bf081bfc@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox