The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] drm/bridge: Set firmware node of drm_bridge instances automatically
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 10:01:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03701609-86b7-47a3-85af-db47035695fb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lfgb24qv22sohgizlmt7kq3ymnshjeawlkwwcndivbeiloip55@x3qnu4ss3x4y>

Hi,


On 5/27/24 05:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:21:07AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> Normally, the drm_bridge::of_node won't be used by bridge driver instances
>> themselves. Rather, it is mainly used by other modules to find associated
>> drm bridge drvier. Therefore, adding a drm bridge to the global bridge list
>> and setting 'of_node' field of a drm bridge share the same goal. Both are
>> for finding purpose, therefore better to group them to one function.
>>
>> Update the drm_bridge_add() interface and implementation to achieve such
>> goal atomically, new implementation will fetch the device node from the
>> backing device of the drm bridge driver automatically. For the majority
>> cases, which is one device backing one drm bridge driver, this model works
>> well. Drivers still can set it manually by passing NULL if this model
>> doesn't fit.
>>
>> While at it, Add a 'struct device *' pointer to the drm_bridge structure.
>> As it already being passed in by both of drm_bridge_add() and
>> devm_drm_bridge_add(). A lot of driver instances has already added it into
>> their derived structure, promote it into drm_bridge core helps to reduce
>> a batch of boilerplates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
>> ---
> 
> [trimmed]
> 
>> @@ -231,7 +243,7 @@ static void drm_bridge_remove_void(void *bridge)
>>    */
>>   int devm_drm_bridge_add(struct device *dev, struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>>   {
>> -	drm_bridge_add(bridge);
>> +	drm_bridge_add(bridge, dev);
>>   	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drm_bridge_remove_void, bridge);
> 
> This breaks aux-hpd-bridge, which gets of_node as an external pointer
> rather than dev->of_node.
> 

Yes, you are right. I forget to modify that driver.
My bad, will be fixed at the next version.

-- 
Best regards
Sui

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-27  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-26 20:21 [PATCH v6 00/10] drm/bridge: Allow using fwnode API to get the next bridge Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] drm/bridge: Allow using fwnode APIs " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] drm/bridge: Set firmware node of drm_bridge instances automatically Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 21:19   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-27  2:01     ` Sui Jingfeng [this message]
2024-05-26 23:33   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-27  2:06     ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] drm/bridge: Implement of_drm_find_bridge() on the top of drm_bridge_find_by_fwnode() Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] drm/bridge: simple-bridge: Use fwnode APIs to acquire device properties Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] drm/bridge: display-connector: " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] drm/bridge: sii902x: Switch to use " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] drm-bridge: it66121: Use " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] drm/bridge: tfp410: " Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] drm/bridge: sii9234: Use fwnode APIs to abstract DT dependent API away Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-26 20:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] drm/bridge: ch7033: Switch to use fwnode based APIs Sui Jingfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03701609-86b7-47a3-85af-db47035695fb@linux.dev \
    --to=sui.jingfeng@linux.dev \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox