The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, hughd@google.com,
	chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com
Cc: riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
	harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
	rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com,
	nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
	pfalcato@suse.de, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:48:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06029485-9e85-4d2d-a324-abba918eecf3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de2f992c-dc93-4b79-b841-11f47511dcfe@kernel.org>



On 11/05/26 12:18 pm, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 5/6/26 11:44, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Initialize nr_pages to 1 at the start of each loop iteration, like
>> folio_referenced_one() does.
>>
>> Without this, nr_pages computed by a previous folio_unmap_pte_batch() call
>> can be reused on a later iteration that does not run
>> folio_unmap_pte_batch() again.
>>
>> I don’t think this is causing a bug today, but it is fragile.
>>
>> A real bug would require this sequence within the same try_to_unmap_one()
>> call:
>>
>> 1. Hit the pte_present(pteval) branch and set nr_pages > 1.
>> 2. Later hit the else branch and do pte_clear() for device-exclusive PTE,
>>    and execute rest of the code with nr_pages > 1.
> 
> Right, for hugetlb folios it should always stay at 1.
> 
>>
>> Executing the above would imply a lazyfree folio is mapped by a mix of
>> present PTEs and device-exclusive PTEs.
> 
> Why lazyfree? We use nr_pages also for
> 
> 	folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages, vma);
> 
> and
> 
> 	folio_put_refs(folio, nr_pages);
> 
> Given that make_device_exclusive() operates on individual PTEs, wouldn't it be
> possible to trigger that?

At the point of this patch, batching is supported for lazyfree and file folios.
make_device_exclusive does not operate on file folios.

> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06  9:44 [PATCH v3 0/9] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-06  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-05-11  6:48   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11  8:18     ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-05-11  8:32       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] mm/rmap: refactor hugetlb pte clearing " Dev Jain
2026-05-11  7:10   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11  8:53     ` Dev Jain
2026-05-11  8:59       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-11  7:28   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-05-11  7:37   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs Dev Jain
2026-05-11  7:41   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-11  7:45   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-11  8:07   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte Dev Jain
2026-05-11  8:13   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11  8:14     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios Dev Jain
2026-05-11  8:16   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-08 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Andrew Morton
2026-05-11  6:21   ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06029485-9e85-4d2d-a324-abba918eecf3@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox