From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, hughd@google.com,
chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com
Cc: riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com,
nphamcs@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
pfalcato@suse.de, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:48:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06029485-9e85-4d2d-a324-abba918eecf3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de2f992c-dc93-4b79-b841-11f47511dcfe@kernel.org>
On 11/05/26 12:18 pm, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 5/6/26 11:44, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Initialize nr_pages to 1 at the start of each loop iteration, like
>> folio_referenced_one() does.
>>
>> Without this, nr_pages computed by a previous folio_unmap_pte_batch() call
>> can be reused on a later iteration that does not run
>> folio_unmap_pte_batch() again.
>>
>> I don’t think this is causing a bug today, but it is fragile.
>>
>> A real bug would require this sequence within the same try_to_unmap_one()
>> call:
>>
>> 1. Hit the pte_present(pteval) branch and set nr_pages > 1.
>> 2. Later hit the else branch and do pte_clear() for device-exclusive PTE,
>> and execute rest of the code with nr_pages > 1.
>
> Right, for hugetlb folios it should always stay at 1.
>
>>
>> Executing the above would imply a lazyfree folio is mapped by a mix of
>> present PTEs and device-exclusive PTEs.
>
> Why lazyfree? We use nr_pages also for
>
> folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages, vma);
>
> and
>
> folio_put_refs(folio, nr_pages);
>
> Given that make_device_exclusive() operates on individual PTEs, wouldn't it be
> possible to trigger that?
At the point of this patch, batching is supported for lazyfree and file folios.
make_device_exclusive does not operate on file folios.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 9:44 [PATCH v3 0/9] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-05-11 6:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 8:18 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-05-11 8:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] mm/rmap: refactor hugetlb pte clearing " Dev Jain
2026-05-11 7:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 8:53 ` Dev Jain
2026-05-11 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-11 7:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-05-11 7:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs Dev Jain
2026-05-11 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-11 7:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-11 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte Dev Jain
2026-05-11 8:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 8:14 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-06 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios Dev Jain
2026-05-11 8:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-08 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Andrew Morton
2026-05-11 6:21 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06029485-9e85-4d2d-a324-abba918eecf3@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox