The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	X86 Kernel <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: Process nmi sources in NMI handler
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 13:47:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bac819f-fdbe-4de2-8a5f-30ded87bb036@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529203325.3039243-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

On 5/29/24 13:33, Jacob Pan wrote:
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Per NMI source specification, there is no guarantee that a valid
> +	 * NMI vector is always delivered, even when the source specified
> +	 * one. It is software's responsibility to check all available NMI
> +	 * sources when bit 0 is set in the NMI source bitmap. i.e. we have
> +	 * to call every handler as if we have no NMI source.
> +	 * On the other hand, if we do get non-zero vectors, we know exactly
> +	 * what the sources are. So we only call the handlers with the bit set.
> +	 */
> +	if (source_bitmask & BIT(NMI_SOURCE_VEC_UNKNOWN)) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("NMI received with unknown source\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +

Note: if bit 0 is set, you can process any other bits first (on the 
general assumption that if you bother with NMI source then those events 
are performance sensitive), and you could even exclude them from the 
poll. This is an optimization, and what you have here is correct from a 
functional point of view.

> +	source_bitmask = fred_event_data(regs);
> +	if (!source_bitmask) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("NMI received without source information!\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}

If the event data word is 0, it probably should be treated as a 
*permanent* failure, as it is a Should Not Happen[TM] situation, and 
means there is an implementation (or, perhaps more likely, 
virtualization!) bug, and as such it may not be safe to trust the NMI 
source information in the future.

> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_NMI_SOURCE) || type != NMI_LOCAL)
> +		return 0;

I'm not sure I understand why you are requiring type to be NMI_LOCAL here?

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-29 20:33 [PATCH 0/6] Add support for NMI source reporting Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/irq: Add enumeration of NMI source reporting CPU feature Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:49   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-05-30 16:19     ` Jacob Pan
2024-05-30 20:39       ` Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/irq: Extend NMI handler registration interface to include source Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-05-30 17:49     ` Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/irq: Factor out common NMI handling code Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: Process nmi sources in NMI handler Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:47   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2024-05-30 16:10     ` Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 21:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-05-30 17:52     ` Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf/x86: Enable NMI source reporting for perfmon Jacob Pan
2024-05-29 20:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/irq: Enable NMI source on IPIs delivered as NMI Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bac819f-fdbe-4de2-8a5f-30ded87bb036@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox