From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: "Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"John Bradford" <john@grabjohn.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:21:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c2001c38104$34c2a690$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030921171632.A11359@pclin040.win.tue.nl
Andries Brouwer:
> Norman Diamond:
> > Vojtech Pavlik:
> >
> > > If anyone would send me samples of Japanese keyboards, you can be sure
> > > I'd test them.
> >
> > Thank you! I was afraid to ask in advance because I thought that you would
> > either refuse or you would ignore the suggestion. Dr. Brouwer did refuse,
> > about 3 years ago or so.
>
> Did I really?
You did on 2001.2.23:
> > would have a use for a Japanese USB keyboard
>
> It would be too expensive to mail.
> Instead of keyboards I prefer to collect scancodes of keyboards,
> and you provided some good information.
> (I also got photographs from someone, maybe you saw:
> http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/kbd/scancodes-3.html )
Returning to this year:
> I think no kernel changes are required to use Japanese keyboards today.
> (But kbd has to be recompiled with NR_KEYS set to 256.)
I'm not convinced yet. defkeymap.c_shipped is included in the downloadable
.bz2 file and it is inadequate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-22 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-14 3:51 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 10:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 11:14 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [1] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:15 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [2] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:21 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3] Norman Diamond
2003-09-16 13:43 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-17 12:35 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-17 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-18 16:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-21 11:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 12:39 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 14:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 17:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-22 12:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-24 10:02 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <fa.gddv2je.1jk671u@ifi.uio.no>
2003-09-16 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2003-09-21 11:01 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 13:26 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 15:16 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-22 12:21 ` Norman Diamond [this message]
2003-09-22 20:14 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 11:44 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-23 17:22 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-15 10:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 16:00 ` Andries Brouwer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-21 12:00 John Bradford
2003-09-21 12:45 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0c2001c38104$34c2a690$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60' \
--to=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox