public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3]
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:21:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <206701c37ab2$6a8033e0$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030914122034.C3371@pclin040.win.tue.nl

"Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:51:32PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote:
> > In thread "Re: Trying to run 2.6.0-test3", Alan Cox replied to me:
> >
> > > > What will it take this time?
> > >
> > > Posting the patch with any luck ?
> >
> > I knew that that would not be sufficient.
>
> Just repeat. Do not repeat the complaining because complaining
> with zero information content is just discarded.
> But if you repeat the patch, together with an explanation of why
> this is the correct patch, sooner or later somebody will look at it.

Due to the complexity of this answer, I am making three separate postings.

I make no assertion that the following is correct or is a patch, but think
that it deserves consideration.  I spend about one day each weekend testing
this kernel, have had patches ignored enough times, and seriously think of
rejoining the set of users who never have time to test.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>; "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>;
"Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Trying to run 2.6.0-test3


> "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> replied to me.
>
> > > accept a USB keyboard but they refused.  The patch which I sent to Vojtech
> > > Pavlik was ignored and these two keys continued not to work (except on my
> > > machine).  Finally Mike Fabian accepted a gift of a USB keyboard and this
> > > defect in Linux got fixed.  But only for somewhere around the last half of
> > > the 2.4 releases, not for 2.6.
> > > What will it take this time?
> >
> > Posting the patch with any luck ?
>
> Hirofumi Ogawa posted a patch for the yen-sign pipe key on 2003.07.23 for
> test1 but his patch still didn't get into test3.  On a PS/2 keyboard that
> seems to be the only key with any problem.
>
> Yesterday when I finally tried a USB keyboard and found that the backslash
> underbar has the same problem, maybe I was the first person to even try a
> Japanese USB keyboard in 2.6, and maybe no one at all tried some number of
> 2.5 series kernels.  As mentioned, usually I can only spend one day a week
> testing 2.6.  I'll try to spend one day next weekend trying to figure out
> the new necessary patch.  If I succeed, but if it gets ignored again, I'll
> probably rejoin the set of users who never have time to test.
>
> I really do think that if Andries Brouwer or Vojtech Pavlik would accept a
> gift of a USB keyboard then this kind of bug would be avoided a lot earlier.
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-14 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-14  3:51 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 10:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 11:14   ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [1] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:15   ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [2] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:21   ` Norman Diamond [this message]
2003-09-16 13:43     ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3] Andries Brouwer
2003-09-17 12:35       ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-17 17:22         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-18 16:15           ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-21 11:06       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 12:39         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:48           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 14:49             ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:07               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 17:42                 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:52                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-22 12:22                 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-24 10:02               ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]     ` <fa.gddv2je.1jk671u@ifi.uio.no>
2003-09-16 18:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2003-09-21 11:01 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 13:26   ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 15:16     ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-22 12:21       ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-22 20:14         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 11:44           ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-23 17:22             ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-15 10:22               ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 16:00   ` Andries Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='206701c37ab2$6a8033e0$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60' \
    --to=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
    --cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox