From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
todd.riffel@intel.com, Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10_service: add hardware dependency
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:59:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d04145a-bd8b-5257-bccd-f9b6c855edcb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123164317.GA16162@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
On 1/23/19 10:43 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:37:07AM -0600, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:00 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:47:56AM -0600, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>>> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add a Kconfig dependency to ensure Intel Stratix10 service layer driver
>>>> can be built only on the platform that supports it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
>>>> index f754578..cac16c4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ config FW_CFG_SYSFS_CMDLINE
>>>>
>>>> config INTEL_STRATIX10_SERVICE
>>>> tristate "Intel Stratix10 Service Layer"
>>>> - depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
>>>> + depends on ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
>>>
>>> That's lame, what about building for testing?
>>
>> Do you mean this instead?
>>
>> depends on (ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC) || COMPILE_TEST
>
> Yes, that would be better, right?
>
>>>
>>> And is this needed now, for 5.0-final, or can it wait for 5.1?
>>
>> This change will reduce kernel size for most arm64. It can go into
>> whichever kernel. We can resubmit allowing for COMPILE_TEST.
>
> So it's not fixing a bug, but rather just allowing you to shrink an
> image? If so, then 5.1 is good.
>
> Please resubmit, after making sure it doesn't break the normal builds :)
Thanks for your review comments, I will resubmit the patch.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 15:47 [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10_service: add hardware dependency richard.gong
2019-01-23 16:00 ` Greg KH
2019-01-23 16:37 ` Alan Tull
2019-01-23 16:42 ` Dinh Nguyen
2019-01-23 17:01 ` Alan Tull
2019-01-23 17:04 ` Dinh Nguyen
2019-01-23 16:43 ` Greg KH
2019-01-23 16:59 ` Richard Gong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d04145a-bd8b-5257-bccd-f9b6c855edcb@linux.intel.com \
--to=richard.gong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
--cc=todd.riffel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox