From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/10] erofs: support user-defined fingerprint name
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 15:34:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d07544d-68ea-4c39-8333-dc262f3c3103@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224040932.496478-6-lihongbo22@huawei.com>
On 2025/12/24 12:09, Hongbo Li wrote:
> From: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> When creating the EROFS image, users can specify the fingerprint name.
> This is to prepare for the upcoming inode page cache share.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 +++--
> fs/erofs/internal.h | 2 ++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 3 +++
> fs/erofs/xattr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/Kconfig b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> index d81f3318417d..b71f2a8074fe 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> @@ -194,3 +194,12 @@ config EROFS_FS_PCPU_KTHREAD_HIPRI
> at higher priority.
>
> If unsure, say N.
> +
> +config EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + bool "EROFS page cache share support (experimental)"
> + depends on EROFS_FS && EROFS_FS_XATTR && !EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND
> + help
> + This enables page cache sharing among inodes with identical
> + content fingerprints on the same machine.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> index e24268acdd62..20515d2462af 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_XATTR_FILTER 0x00000004
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SHARED_EA_IN_METABOX 0x00000008
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_PLAIN_XATTR_PFX 0x00000010
> -
> +#define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_ISHARE_XATTRS 0x00000020
>
> /*
> * Any bits that aren't in EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT should
> @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
> __le32 xattr_prefix_start; /* start of long xattr prefixes */
> __le64 packed_nid; /* nid of the special packed inode */
> __u8 xattr_filter_reserved; /* reserved for xattr name filter */
> - __u8 reserved[3];
> + __u8 ishare_xattr_prefix_id; /* indexes the ishare key in prefix xattres */
> + __u8 reserved[2];
> __le32 build_time; /* seconds added to epoch for mkfs time */
> __le64 rootnid_8b; /* (48BIT on) nid of root directory */
> __le64 reserved2;
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> index 98fe652aea33..99e2857173c3 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> u32 xattr_blkaddr;
> u32 xattr_prefix_start;
> u8 xattr_prefix_count;
> + u8 ishare_xattr_pfx;
Could we use the same naming as `ishare_xattr_prefix_id`?
> struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *xattr_prefixes;
> unsigned int xattr_filter_reserved;
> #endif
> @@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, compat, COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(xattr_filter, compat, COMPAT_XATTR_FILTER)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(shared_ea_in_metabox, compat, COMPAT_SHARED_EA_IN_METABOX)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(plain_xattr_pfx, compat, COMPAT_PLAIN_XATTR_PFX)
> +EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(ishare_xattrs, compat, COMPAT_ISHARE_XATTRS)
>
> static inline u64 erofs_nid_to_ino64(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, erofs_nid_t nid)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 2a44c4e5af4f..68480f10e69d 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> + if (erofs_sb_has_ishare_xattrs(sbi))
> + sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx =
> + dsb->ishare_xattr_prefix_id & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX_MASK;
It seems this part is still unmodified.
But after checking the code just now, I agree it may need more work
in order to pass dsb to erofs_xattr_prefixes_init(), so I can live
with the current status.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> ret = -EINVAL;
> sbi->feature_incompat = le32_to_cpu(dsb->feature_incompat);
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> index 396536d9a862..969e77efd038 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,19 @@ int erofs_xattr_prefixes_init(struct super_block *sb)
> }
>
> erofs_put_metabuf(&buf);
> + if (!ret && erofs_sb_has_ishare_xattrs(sbi)) {
> + struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf = pfs + sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx;
> + struct erofs_xattr_long_prefix *newpfx;
> +
> + newpfx = krealloc(pf->prefix,
> + sizeof(*newpfx) + pf->infix_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (newpfx) {
> + newpfx->infix[pf->infix_len] = '\0';
> + pf->prefix = newpfx;
> + } else {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> sbi->xattr_prefixes = pfs;
> if (ret)
> erofs_xattr_prefixes_cleanup(sb);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 4:09 [PATCH v11 00/10] erofs: Introduce page cache sharing feature Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 01/10] iomap: stash iomap read ctx in the private field of iomap_iter Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 02/10] erofs: hold read context in iomap_iter if needed Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 03/10] fs: Export alloc_empty_backing_file Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 04/10] erofs: move `struct erofs_anon_fs_type` to super.c Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:25 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 6:26 ` Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 05/10] erofs: support user-defined fingerprint name Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 7:34 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2025-12-25 3:17 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-25 4:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-25 6:24 ` Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 06/10] erofs: support domain-specific page cache share Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 7:35 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 07/10] erofs: introduce the page cache share feature Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 8:09 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 9:26 ` Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 10:05 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 08/10] erofs: support unencoded inodes for page cache share Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 8:15 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 09/10] erofs: support compressed " Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 8:18 ` Gao Xiang
2025-12-24 4:09 ` [PATCH v11 10/10] erofs: implement .fadvise " Hongbo Li
2025-12-24 8:19 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d07544d-68ea-4c39-8333-dc262f3c3103@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox