From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: jejb@linux.ibm.com, daejun7.park@samsung.com,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"huobean@gmail.com" <huobean@gmail.com>,
Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix proper API to send HPB pre-request
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:59:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d66b6d0-26c6-573f-e2a0-022e22c47b52@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f9229c3c4c7859524411a47db96a3b53ac89c90.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/28/21 7:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> If the block people are happy with this, then I'm OK with it, but it
> doesn't look like you've solved the fanout deadlock problem because
> this new mechanism is still going to allocate a new tag.
(+Jens, Christoph and linux-block)
Hi James,
My understanding is that the UFS HPB code makes ufshcd_queuecommand()
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY if the pool with pre-allocated requests is
exhausted. This will make the SCSI core reissue a SCSI command until
completion of another command has freed up one of the pre-allocated
requests. This is not the most efficient approach but should not trigger
a deadlock.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p6>
2021-10-27 22:36 ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix proper API to send HPB pre-request Daejun Park
2021-10-28 4:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 14:28 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 17:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 15:59 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-10-28 19:12 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 21:20 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-28 15:22 ` James Bottomley
2021-10-29 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-29 1:50 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-29 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-29 2:50 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-29 3:14 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-29 4:39 ` Daejun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d66b6d0-26c6-573f-e2a0-022e22c47b52@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keosung.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox