public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Bob Miller <rem@osdl.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] v2.5.22 - add wait queue function callback support
Date: 17 Jun 2002 14:12:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1024348340.922.124.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020617135744.A24347@doc.pdx.osdl.net>

On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 13:57, Bob Miller wrote:

> It depends on what you mean by killed off.  I submitted a patch to Linus back
> at 2.5.3 to clean up the way the completion code called the wait queue
> interface.  This interface got added then.  You picked up those changes at
> that time (and still have them in your kernel tree) but the changes have
> never made it into Linus' tree.
> 
> So, Linus has never had the code to 'kill' and you've never dropped it
> after picking it up.

Work has gone in since this.

During 2.5.20, Linus asked for and I submitted a patch to remove the
whole wq_lock_t mess altogether.  It was merged into 2.5.21. 
Subsequently, there is no wq_lock_t abstraction in current 2.5 kernels
and code should use a standard spinlock.

	Robert Love


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-06-17 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-17 20:14 [patch] v2.5.22 - add wait queue function callback support Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-17 20:28 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-17 20:53   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-17 21:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-17 22:09       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-17 22:20         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-17 20:57   ` Bob Miller
2002-06-17 21:08     ` Dave Jones
2002-06-17 21:23       ` Bob Miller
2002-06-17 21:12     ` Robert Love [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1024348340.922.124.camel@sinai \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=davej@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rem@osdl.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox