From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] v2.5.22 - add wait queue function callback support
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:53:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020617165340.F1457@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020617222812.I758@suse.de>; from davej@suse.de on Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 10:28:12PM +0200
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 10:28:12PM +0200, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > +#define add_wait_queue_cond(q, wait, cond) \
> > + ({ \
> > + unsigned long flags; \
> > + int _raced = 0; \
> > + wq_write_lock_irqsave(&(q)->lock, flags); \
>
> I thought we killed off wq_write_lock_irqsave 1-2 kernels ago ?
Ah, I didn't notice that as I've not reached the point of merging
everything into a working build -- I'd like to get some feedback
and comments on the mergable units as they become available, since
I'm rewriting a few portions to fix problems that experience with
the code revealed. Anyways, the patch below changes add_wait_queue_cond
to use spin_locks directly.
-ben
diff -urN wq-func-v2.5.22.diff/include/linux/wait.h wq-func-v2.5.22-b.diff/include/linux/wait.h
--- wq-func-v2.5.22.diff/include/linux/wait.h Mon Jun 17 15:53:25 2002
+++ wq-func-v2.5.22-b.diff/include/linux/wait.h Mon Jun 17 16:46:23 2002
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
({ \
unsigned long flags; \
int _raced = 0; \
- wq_write_lock_irqsave(&(q)->lock, flags); \
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&(q)->lock, flags); \
(wait)->flags = 0; \
__add_wait_queue((q), (wait)); \
rmb(); \
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
_raced = 1; \
__remove_wait_queue((q), (wait)); \
} \
- wq_write_unlock_irqrestore(&(q)->lock, flags); \
+ spin_lock_irqrestore(&(q)->lock, flags); \
_raced; \
})
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 20:14 [patch] v2.5.22 - add wait queue function callback support Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-17 20:28 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-17 20:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-06-17 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-17 22:09 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-17 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-17 20:57 ` Bob Miller
2002-06-17 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-17 21:23 ` Bob Miller
2002-06-17 21:12 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020617165340.F1457@redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox