The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: promise ultra 133 tx2 lets system standby during use...?
@ 2002-08-15 12:27 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
  2002-08-15 13:27 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Munck Steenholdt @ 2002-08-15 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel

> On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 12:11, Thomas Munck Steenholdt wrote:
> > That would be in the BIOS right (or could it be done from linux) ?
> 
> If you know the chipset and the docs are around then its actually
> normally very easy to poke from Linux too. Depends on the chipset
> 
> > Would apm=off bypass this kind of thing?
> 
> It may do yes
> 
OK, I'll try the apm=off first to see if that resolves my problem...
are there any examples/places to look if i decided to update the
APM monitor list from linux? Anywhere I could get an idea of how that
could be done?
I don't know the chipset atm.

Thanks

Thomas

-- Send gratis SMS og brug gratis e-mail på Everyday.com -- 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: promise ultra 133 tx2 lets system standby during use...?
@ 2002-08-15 12:24 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Munck Steenholdt @ 2002-08-15 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Cox, "Thomas Munck Steenholdt"; +Cc: linux-kernel

> On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 12:11, Thomas Munck Steenholdt wrote:
> > That would be in the BIOS right (or could it be done from linux) ?
> 
> If you know the chipset and the docs are around then its actually
> normally very easy to poke from Linux too. Depends on the chipset
> 
> > Would apm=off bypass this kind of thing?
> 
> It may do yes
> 

OK, I'll try the apm=off first to see if that resolves my problem...
are there any examples/places to look if i decided to update the
APM monitor list from linux? Anywhere I could get an idea of how that
could be done?
I don't know the chipset atm.

Thanks

Thomas



-- Send gratis SMS og brug gratis e-mail på Everyday.com -- 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: promise ultra 133 tx2 lets system standby during use...?
@ 2002-08-15 11:11 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
  2002-08-15 12:08 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Munck Steenholdt @ 2002-08-15 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel

> On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 11:21, Thomas Munck Steenholdt wrote:
> > I've been having a lot of problems with my Ultra 133 TX2 controller,
> > that if I boot my system a just doesn't touch it for a while, the
> system
> > suspends to complete standby, even though the ext3 data is committed
> > every 5 secs. causing disk activity and thus should disallow standby
> > behaviour (at least that's the way it works on my onboard controller).
> 
> Lots of BIOSes are not bright enough to monitor a second IDE controller.
> You should be able to frob in the APM/ACPI bios and add its IRQ line to
> the monitor list

That would be in the BIOS right (or could it be done from linux) ?

Like i mentioned, my system is an IBM, which means tailored for users, 
which means that it(this particular system) won't let me add IRQ's to
monitor, at least not from within the BIOS setup.
I can select to monitor "Hard Disks" "Serial Ports" that kind
of granularity... But at least, what you are telling me, suggests to me
that actually this is probably a problem in my BIOS rather than the kernel.

Would apm=off bypass this kind of thing?


-- Send gratis SMS og brug gratis e-mail på Everyday.com -- 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* promise ultra 133 tx2 lets system standby during use...?
@ 2002-08-15 10:21 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
  2002-08-15 10:59 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Munck Steenholdt @ 2002-08-15 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I've been having a lot of problems with my Ultra 133 TX2 controller,
that if I boot my system a just doesn't touch it for a while, the system
suspends to complete standby, even though the ext3 data is committed
every 5 secs. causing disk activity and thus should disallow standby
behaviour (at least that's the way it works on my onboard controller).
This has been a problem for ages and I sinerely thought it had been
fixed in the 2.4.19 kernel, and so it seemed for a while, until it
happened again(guess i had to figure out to trigger it once again)
it seems the best way to spot it is to leave the system alone completely,
after a boot - then just wait for an apm standby event to happen.

Any thoughts on this problem?

Best regards
Thomas

-- Send gratis SMS og brug gratis e-mail på Everyday.com -- 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-15 19:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-15 12:27 promise ultra 133 tx2 lets system standby during use...? Thomas Munck Steenholdt
2002-08-15 13:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-15 20:02   ` Thomas Munck Steenholdt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-15 12:24 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
2002-08-15 11:11 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
2002-08-15 12:08 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-15 10:21 Thomas Munck Steenholdt
2002-08-15 10:59 ` Alan Cox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox