From: Warren Togami <warren@togami.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21-rc7 AMD64 dpt_i2o fails compile
Date: 05 Jun 2003 19:33:02 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054877581.3699.113.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1054842344.15457.43.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 09:45, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2003-06-05 at 13:15, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> >
> > > Fixing up dpt_i2o for the new DMA stuff is a major job. Fixing it
> for
> > > 64bit cleanness even more so.
> >
> > If the hardware/firmware supports 64bit pointers then at least AMD64
> > can work without the PCI DMA API.
>
> 32bit all around as far I as I can tell
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/support/suppdetail.html?cat=%2fProduct%2fASR-2110S&prodkey=ASR-2110S
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/support/techspecs.html?prodkey=ASR-2110S&cat=%2fProduct%2fASR-2110S
Adaptec SCSI RAID 2110S claims to be a "64-bit/66MHz PCI-to-SCSI RAID
card". The physical card is longer than normal 32-bit PCI cards with
more pins that fit into a "64-bit PCI slot". Are Adaptec's claims of
64-bit hardware false?
32-bit Red Hat 9 with dpt_i2o is working great with Opteron and this
card, so I have a safe option to fallback on if we can't fix the 64-bit
operation.
Warren Togami
warren@togami.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1054789161.3699.67.camel@laptop.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030605010841.A29837@devserv.devel.redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1054799692.3699.77.camel@laptop.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1054808477.15276.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-06-05 12:15 ` 2.4.21-rc7 AMD64 dpt_i2o fails compile Andi Kleen
2003-06-05 19:45 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-05 19:51 ` Andi Kleen
2003-06-06 5:33 ` Warren Togami [this message]
2003-06-06 8:24 ` Andi Kleen
2003-06-06 15:26 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <1054789161.3699.67.camel@laptop>
[not found] ` <20030605010841.A29837@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
2003-06-05 7:54 ` Warren Togami
2003-06-05 10:21 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1054877581.3699.113.camel@laptop \
--to=warren@togami.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox