From: Miguel Freitas <miguel@cetuc.puc-rio.br>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR linux scheduler policy ...
Date: 12 Jul 2003 16:13:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058037226.1196.122.camel@mf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307120922450.4351@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 13:30, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > Patch acceptance is
> > > tricky and definitely would need more discussion and test.
> >
> > Sure. But let me add a voice of support here: I would be great if kernel
> > provided a way to multimedia or interactive applications to request a
> > better latency predictability (or hint the scheduler somehow) without
> > need of being root. If that comes in a form of a new scheduler policy,
> > or just allowing small negative nice values for non-root i don't mind...
>
> You'd need a nice value that will keep you away from being caught by
> interactive SCHED_OTHER. Otherwise yes, this is another solution. Did you
> try it with xine under high load ?
Since i upgraded my computer recently it's difficult to compare with the
experiments i made before. But basically no, i haven't tried to make
xine smooth under high load. my primary complain was that even a small
background load caused by KSysGuard (KDE system monitor) could make it
drop frames from time to time. with nice values like -2 the problem was
completely fixed.
regards,
Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-12 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-12 13:43 [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR linux scheduler policy Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 15:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 15:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-12 15:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 16:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-12 16:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 16:41 ` Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 18:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 1:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 14:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 17:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 22:42 ` Bill Huey
2003-07-13 2:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 3:59 ` Bill Huey
2003-07-12 16:34 ` Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 16:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 19:13 ` Miguel Freitas [this message]
2003-07-12 20:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 18:44 ` Jamie Lokier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-10 2:33 Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 11:50 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-13 16:08 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058037226.1196.122.camel@mf \
--to=miguel@cetuc.puc-rio.br \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox