From: Bill Huey (Hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Miguel Freitas <miguel@cetuc.puc-rio.br>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bill Huey (Hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR linux scheduler policy ...
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:42:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030712224246.GA5354@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307120845470.4351@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:59:18AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > With the current patch you do not need any special support if you are
> > > already asking for SCHED_RR policy. If you are not root you will be
> > > automatically downgraded to SCHED_SOFTRR ;)
> >
> > Cool. What happens if you run two SCHED_SOFTRR tasks and they both
> > use 50% of the CPU - will that starve all the other tasks? Or is the
> > CPU usage of all SOFTRR tasks bounded collectively?
>
> Nope :) They will run their timeslice entirely and then they will try to
> get some more. Looking at their last recharge timestamp, Dad scheduler
> will put them in bed and will give other tasks a chance to run. But don't
> worry, I am very sure there're other exploit available. I just didn't have
> enough time to think about it. It is amazing how limited are things that
> you can do in one hour :)
Hey,
Have any of you folks seen this ?
http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6078481804.html
http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/papers/tr-99-59_abstract.html
Neat stuff. This with a fully preemptive kernel is one of Linux kernel
dreams for multimedia.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-12 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-12 13:43 [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR linux scheduler policy Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 15:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 15:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-12 15:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 16:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-12 16:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 16:41 ` Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 18:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 1:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 14:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 17:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 22:42 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2003-07-13 2:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 3:59 ` Bill Huey
2003-07-12 16:34 ` Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 16:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 19:13 ` Miguel Freitas
2003-07-12 20:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 18:44 ` Jamie Lokier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-10 2:33 Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 11:50 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-13 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-13 16:08 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030712224246.GA5354@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel@cetuc.puc-rio.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox