* Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4
@ 2003-08-31 14:05 Petr Baudis
2003-08-31 15:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Baudis @ 2003-08-31 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fbdev-users, linux-kernel
Hello,
so I've enthusiastically tried to boot up 2.6.0-test4 even outside of UML,
however I've been hit hard by radeonfb - there're not even slighest signs of it
working. Regardless on the video mode I choose on the command line, setting the
mode fails and I end up with the display showing the BIOS POST screen (that one
with energy star logo in corner, BIOS blabbering smt about disks and so on)
covered with odd-coloured vertical lines. At the top of the screen is something
like the classic textmode stains (red dots grouped to lines; reminded me of the
days of turbopascal ;) and in the top few lines white points which actually
moved around and changed as stuff was been virtually printed onto the screen.
So it looks like the driver got the video RAM coordinates a bit wrong and it
writes stuff into a wrong place - or it forgot to move the frame to point to
where it should (or whatever, I can't say I understand the video stuff newer
than 1996 a lot ;).
I have ATI Radeon 7000 w/ 64M RAM and TV output (unused). The driver
announces itself as:
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb: ref_clk=2700, ref_div=12, xclk=14300 from BIOS
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb: probed SDR SGRAM 65536k videoram
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeon_get_moninfo: bios 4 scratch = 2000002
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb: ATI Radeon VE QY SDR SGRAM 64 MB
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb: DVI port no monitor connected
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb: CRT port CRT monitor connected
Aug 30 23:49:45 machine kernel: radeonfb_pci_register END
If you need any further additional info, please let me know.
It appears that the 2.6 driver is essentially the old one, without Ben's
patch (which fixed framebuffer for me on 2.4). Is there a version of this
updated driver for 2.6 as well? Is there any reason why it is not integrated
yet?
Thanks in advance,
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
.
Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when
there is no longer anything to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
.
Stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4
2003-08-31 14:05 Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4 Petr Baudis
@ 2003-08-31 15:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-01 8:52 ` [Linux-fbdev-users] " Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2003-08-31 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis; +Cc: linux-fbdev-users, linux-kernel mailing list
> It appears that the 2.6 driver is essentially the old one, without Ben's
> patch (which fixed framebuffer for me on 2.4). Is there a version of this
> updated driver for 2.6 as well? Is there any reason why it is not integrated
> yet?
I'm working on a new driver for 2.6 that include my 2.4 updates, a
slightly reworked version of Kronos and Jon i2c DDC code and some
more source cleanup (split the driver in separate files actually).
It's not finished yet though. I'm not yet sure I'll add support for
dual head in the first version neither, all of this pretty much depends
on how much time I'll be able to dedicate to it during the upcoming
week.
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] Re: Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4
2003-08-31 15:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2003-09-01 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-01 11:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2003-09-01 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Petr Baudis, linux-fbdev-users, linux-kernel mailing list
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > It appears that the 2.6 driver is essentially the old one, without Ben's
> > patch (which fixed framebuffer for me on 2.4). Is there a version of this
> > updated driver for 2.6 as well? Is there any reason why it is not integrated
> > yet?
>
> I'm working on a new driver for 2.6 that include my 2.4 updates, a
> slightly reworked version of Kronos and Jon i2c DDC code and some
> more source cleanup (split the driver in separate files actually).
>
> It's not finished yet though. I'm not yet sure I'll add support for
> dual head in the first version neither, all of this pretty much depends
> on how much time I'll be able to dedicate to it during the upcoming
> week.
What about `release early, release often', and add the dual-head support after
your first release? ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] Re: Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4
2003-09-01 8:52 ` [Linux-fbdev-users] " Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2003-09-01 11:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2003-09-01 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Petr Baudis, linux-fbdev-users, linux-kernel mailing list
> > I'm working on a new driver for 2.6 that include my 2.4 updates, a
> > slightly reworked version of Kronos and Jon i2c DDC code and some
> > more source cleanup (split the driver in separate files actually).
> >
> > It's not finished yet though. I'm not yet sure I'll add support for
> > dual head in the first version neither, all of this pretty much depends
> > on how much time I'll be able to dedicate to it during the upcoming
> > week.
>
> What about `release early, release often', and add the dual-head support after
> your first release? ;-)
Yup, I'll probably do just that, but still, there is work to get
to the first release...
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-01 11:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-31 14:05 Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4 Petr Baudis
2003-08-31 15:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-01 8:52 ` [Linux-fbdev-users] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-01 11:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox