From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: davids@webmaster.com
Cc: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Raphaël Rigo LKML" <lkml@twilight-hall.net>
Subject: RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:22:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1100042579.16729.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEKLPKAA.davids@webmaster.com>
On Maw, 2004-11-09 at 19:30, David Schwartz wrote:
> Look, this really is simple. When the GPL talks about "additional
> restrictions", it doesn't mean the restrictions found in the GPL. It means
> restrictions found elsewhere, such as in private contracts. (Where else
> would the restrictions be?!)
It talks about additional restrictions imposed on your GPL granted
rights. It seems very simple to me. Future upgrade services are a
seperate contractual matter. Your whole position is positively
ridiculous. Very large amounts of GPL code is released where you don't
get updates, ever, whatever you do. Yet you don't object to those.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-10 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-07 17:27 GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox + code Shawn Starr
2004-11-07 19:33 ` Raphaël Rigo LKML
2004-11-07 19:38 ` Shawn Starr
2004-11-07 21:16 ` Daniel Egger
2004-11-08 1:14 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-08 14:56 ` Pedro Venda (SYSADM)
2004-11-08 20:53 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-08 15:24 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-08 19:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-11-08 21:33 ` Pedro Venda (SYSADM)
2004-11-08 21:54 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-08 23:25 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-08 20:53 ` GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code David Schwartz
2004-11-08 23:00 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-09 2:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-11-09 4:08 ` David Rees
2004-11-09 4:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-11-09 9:47 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-09 19:30 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-09 19:45 ` Chris Friesen
2004-11-09 20:23 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-09 20:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-09 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-10 1:47 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-10 9:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-11-10 18:14 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-10 19:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-10 20:09 ` Stuart MacDonald
2004-11-10 21:18 ` Trever L. Adams
2004-11-09 23:22 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-11-10 1:34 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-11-10 2:01 ` Michael Poole
2004-11-10 3:02 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-11-10 4:14 ` Michael Poole
2004-11-10 4:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-11-10 21:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-11-10 23:09 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-11-10 22:14 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-15 14:47 ` David Woodhouse
2004-11-10 23:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-11-10 5:07 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-10 1:47 ` David Schwartz
2004-11-12 17:04 ` Horst von Brand
2004-11-09 21:13 ` Stuart MacDonald
2004-11-09 2:23 ` GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox + code Paul Jakma
2004-11-10 10:21 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1100042579.16729.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@twilight-hall.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox