From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
akpm@osdl.org, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: notifier chain problem? (was Re: 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:38:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144953491.4762.77.camel@linuxchandra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060413175342.GF6663@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 19:53 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Looks strange, the faulting address is in the same region as the
> > >> eip. I am not that strong on x86 layouts, so I am not sure whether
> > >> 0x78xxxxxx is the kernel's mapping or it's module space. Almost looks
> > >> like something else had registered a notifier and then gone away
> > >> without unregistering it.
> > >
> > >sorry, the essential data I didn't provide here is
> > >probably that I configured the 2G/2G split, which for
> > >unknown reasons actually is a 2.125/1.875 split and
> > >starts at 0x78000000 (instead of 0x80000000)
> >
> > That's how it is coded in arch/i386/Kconfig. It says 78 rather than 80.
> > Maybe Con has an idea?
>
> here is the same oops with 3/1 split and the bootup log
>
Hi Herbert,
Looks to be the same stack as earlier, Is there any modules compiled in
that were removed before you tried to mount the XFS filesystem ?
Can you send me the .config file.
chandra
<snip>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 5:21 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-13 5:35 ` Nathan Scott
2006-04-13 9:23 ` Keith Owens
2006-04-13 14:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-13 9:36 ` Keith Owens
2006-04-13 15:12 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-13 7:23 ` notifier chain problem? (was Re: 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS) David Chinner
2006-04-13 8:40 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-04-13 13:50 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-13 14:10 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-04-13 14:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-13 14:32 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-13 17:53 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-13 18:38 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2006-04-14 1:39 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-13 18:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-14 1:30 ` Herbert Poetzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144953491.4762.77.camel@linuxchandra \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox