From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] MMIO accessors & barriers documentation
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:29:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158010198.3879.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157995595.23085.194.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 18:26 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-09-11 am 19:59 +1000, ysgrifennodd Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> > Ok, so we would define ordering on the first and last accesses (being
> > the first and last in ascending addresses order) and leave it free to
> > the implementation to do what it wants in between. Is that ok ?
>
> Not sure you can go that far. I'd stick to "_fromio/_toio" transfer
> blocks of data efficiently between host and bus addresses. The
> guarantees are the same as readl/writel respectively with respect to the
> start and end of the transfer.
>
> [How do you define start and end addresses with memcpy_fromio(foo, bar,
> 4) for example ]
Ok. So they behave like a writel or a readl globally respective to other
accesses but there is no guarantee in order or size of the individual
transfers making them up.
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-11 4:03 [RFC] MMIO accessors & barriers documentation Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 8:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-11 9:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-11 9:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 17:26 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-11 21:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-09-12 5:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-12 5:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-12 6:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-12 7:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-12 15:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-09-12 21:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-13 0:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-09-13 1:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-09-11 21:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 21:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 22:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 23:08 ` Roland Dreier
2006-09-11 23:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 23:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12 0:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-12 15:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-09-11 22:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-09-11 23:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-12 5:33 Albert Cahalan
2006-09-12 5:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1158010198.3879.52.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox