public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* set_task_rq bug?
@ 2008-04-02  7:52 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
  2008-04-02  7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri @ 2008-04-02  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: a.p.zijlstra
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, aneesh.kumar, dhaval, linux-kernel, Balbir Singh

For the case of CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED and !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, this
piece of code seems to be wrong?

/* Change a task's cfs_rq and parent entity if it moves across
 * CPUs/groups */
static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
        p->se.cfs_rq = task_group(p)->cfs_rq[cpu];
        p->se.parent = task_group(p)->se[cpu];
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
        p->rt.rt_rq  = task_group(p)->rt_rq[cpu];
        p->rt.parent = task_group(p)->rt_se[cpu];
#endif
}

Basically for the above config case, a task's p->se.cfs_rq is never set,
which seems to be incorrect, as lot of sched_fair.c (for ex:
enqueue_task_fair) banks on the availability of this information. It should 
atleast be set to &rq->cfs?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-02  8:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-02  7:52 set_task_rq bug? Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-04-02  7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02  8:12   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox