public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:11:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222283477.4425.55.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24051.1222282618@redhat.com>


On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> 
> > Is there any reason I shouldn't use truncate() in regular shmem.c if I
> > were to unify the two files?
> 
> It would be nice to keep tiny-shmem.c, well, tiny for NOMMU systems that can't
> have swap and can't have virtual memory.  Note that regular shmem does not now
> build on top of ramfs, so you'd have to port the ramfs internals to it.

As the original author of tiny-shmem.c, I will naturally try to bear
this in mind. The goal would be to build both a regular and a tiny
version from one C file so that they won't diverge again in the future.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-24 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-10 11:37 [patch] x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-10 11:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 11:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 15:12         ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 14:48       ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 15:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-10 15:17           ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 15:26           ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-11  8:27             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 10:43               ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-12  9:24                 ` [PATCH] sysfs: fix deadlock Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 22:02                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-15  9:15                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-14  7:39               ` [lockdep] possible circular locking, between &mm->mmap_sem and &dev->ev_mutex Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14  7:44                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-14  8:06                   ` [patch] mm: fix locking, inotify_read's ev_mutex vs do_page_fault's mmap_sem Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 22:12                     ` [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex Nick Piggin
2008-09-17 20:14                       ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-17 20:46                         ` Matt Mackall
2008-09-18 11:12                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 19:29                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-18 21:11                             ` Matt Mackall
2008-09-20  2:18                               ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-20 16:12                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-09-22 14:54                                   ` David Howells
2008-09-23  5:32                                     ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-24 18:18                                       ` David Howells
2008-09-24 18:29                                         ` Matt Mackall
2008-09-24 18:56                                           ` David Howells
2008-09-24 19:11                                             ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2008-09-24 19:26                                               ` David Howells
2008-09-24 19:41                                           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-09-24 19:59                                             ` David Howells
2008-09-24 23:43                                               ` Hugh Dickins
2008-09-24 19:29                                       ` Hugh Dickins
2008-09-24 19:47                                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-22 15:14                                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-09-19  8:40                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 21:36                   ` [lockdep] possible circular locking, between &mm->mmap_sem and &dev->ev_mutex Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 14:30     ` [patch] x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 14:31 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222283477.4425.55.camel@calx \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox