* __hw_perf_counter_init() on x86
@ 2009-09-09 6:49 David Miller
2009-09-09 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-09-09 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: a.p.zijlstra, linux-kernel
It seems that for most of the error returns this function
can give, we'll leak the active_counters count grabbed
at the beginning of the function and therefore we'll never
re-enable the LAPIC NMI watchdog even once all the perf
counter users go away.
Just FYI...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: __hw_perf_counter_init() on x86
2009-09-09 6:49 __hw_perf_counter_init() on x86 David Miller
@ 2009-09-09 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-09 8:30 ` David Miller
2009-09-20 18:06 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-09-09 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 23:49 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> It seems that for most of the error returns this function
> can give, we'll leak the active_counters count grabbed
> at the beginning of the function and therefore we'll never
> re-enable the LAPIC NMI watchdog even once all the perf
> counter users go away.
>
> Just FYI...
Thanks!
---
Subject: perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak
Dave noticed that we leak the PMU resource reservations when we fail the
hardware counter init.
Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index f9cd084..5224371 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -924,6 +924,8 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
if (err)
return err;
+ counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
+
/*
* Generate PMC IRQs:
* (keep 'enabled' bit clear for now)
@@ -953,8 +955,6 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
-
/*
* Raw event type provide the config in the event structure
*/
@@ -2093,8 +2093,11 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
int err;
err = __hw_perf_counter_init(counter);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ if (counter->destroy)
+ counter->destroy(counter);
return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
return &pmu;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: __hw_perf_counter_init() on x86
2009-09-09 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2009-09-09 8:30 ` David Miller
2009-09-20 18:06 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-09-09 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: a.p.zijlstra; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:04:47 +0200
> Subject: perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak
>
> Dave noticed that we leak the PMU resource reservations when we fail the
> hardware counter init.
>
> Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Looks great.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak
2009-09-09 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-09 8:30 ` David Miller
@ 2009-09-20 18:06 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-09-20 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, tglx, mingo, davem
Commit-ID: a1792cdacaf5180e04e07811e220c4a3b4a9c33e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a1792cdacaf5180e04e07811e220c4a3b4a9c33e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:04:47 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:53:57 +0200
perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak
Dave noticed that we leak the PMU resource reservations when we
fail the hardware counter init.
Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
LKML-Reference: <1252483487.7746.164.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index dbdf712..a6c8b27 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -924,6 +924,8 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
if (err)
return err;
+ counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
+
/*
* Generate PMC IRQs:
* (keep 'enabled' bit clear for now)
@@ -953,8 +955,6 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
-
/*
* Raw event type provide the config in the event structure
*/
@@ -2107,8 +2107,11 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
int err;
err = __hw_perf_counter_init(counter);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ if (counter->destroy)
+ counter->destroy(counter);
return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
return &pmu;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-20 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-09 6:49 __hw_perf_counter_init() on x86 David Miller
2009-09-09 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-09 8:30 ` David Miller
2009-09-20 18:06 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: x86: Fix PMU resource leak tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox