From: George Kashperko <george@znau.edu.ua>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>,
"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"George Kashperko" <george@znau.edu.ua>,
"b43-dev@lists.infradead.org" <b43-dev@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Russell King" <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linuxdriverproject <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:10:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302333026.18361.8.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vtmqm7fw3ri7v4@arend-laptop>
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:56:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2011/4/6 Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>:
> >> 3. Device identification
> >>
> >> The cores are identified by manufacturer, core id and revision in your
> >> patch. I would not use the revision because 4 out of 5 times a revision
> >> change does indicate a hardware change but no change in programming
> >> interface. The enumeration data does contain a more selective field
> >> indicating the core class (4 bits following the core identifier). I
> >> suggest
> >> to replace the revision field by this class field.
> >
> > Could you say something more about *class*, please? For my BCM43224 it
> > seems to be 0x0. WIll check BCM4313 in a moment.
> >
>
> In principal the manufacturer id is unique (defined/assigned by JEDEC
> www.jedec.org) and the chip id and chip class are defined by the
> manufacturer. So I can only indicate what classes Broadcom uses in
> combination with the manufacturer id BRCM, ARM and MIPS.
>
> /* Component Classes */
> #define CC_SIM 0
> #define CC_EROM 1
> #define CC_CORESIGHT 9
> #define CC_VERIF 0xb
> #define CC_OPTIMO 0xd
> #define CC_GEN 0xe
> #define CC_PRIMECELL 0xf
>
> Looking at this it seems strange that you see a class value of 0x0. It may
> be rarely used or for non-production chips only (for simulation, chip
> bringup) which may require additional (debug) functions. So question is
> whether you will need it, but it is specified by ARM and it is up to
> manufacturers to use it. So I it is better to be safe than sorry and have
> this in the device id.
>
> Gr. AvS
When parsing bcm4716 EROM I have
cia & CIA_CCL_MASK equal to 0 for all 9 cores
You mentioned ARM DMP (Device Management Plugin) several times in
earlier messages some time ago but I can't find anything relevant about
that at ARM infocenter. Any chance you can point more precise location
for any DMP reference?
Have nice day,
George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1302033463-1846-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1302032137.3969.10.camel@Joe-Laptop>
[not found] ` <BANLkTimTmqop-xzFsWr1=2RXv5z6iTre4Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1302035106.1923.7.camel@maggie>
2011-04-05 22:30 ` [PATCH] ssb: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>, remove CONFIG_SSB_SILENT Joe Perches
2011-04-06 14:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver Arend van Spriel
2011-04-06 18:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 20:25 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-06 20:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 20:42 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 20:57 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-06 21:01 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 21:08 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-06 21:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-06 21:18 ` George Kashperko
2011-04-06 23:20 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-07 0:00 ` George Kashperko
2011-04-07 0:54 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-07 1:02 ` George Kashperko
2011-04-07 7:54 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-07 8:58 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-07 18:50 ` George Kashperko
2011-04-07 9:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-07 18:36 ` George Kashperko
2011-04-06 21:20 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-08 16:56 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:24 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-08 17:27 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-08 17:28 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-08 17:31 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-09 7:10 ` George Kashperko [this message]
2011-04-09 11:01 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-10 8:01 ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-10 8:05 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-10 8:24 ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-10 8:30 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-10 9:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-10 11:32 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-10 14:36 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-10 16:11 ` George Kashperko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302333026.18361.8.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua \
--to=george@znau.edu.ua \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox