From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com, Tim.Deegan@citrix.com,
jbeulich@novell.com, snanda@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:00:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307138409.14598.52.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603144540.d182c231.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But the whole thing is a bit weird. Does this look better?
> Make these messages more gramatically pleasing, more consistent and remove
> strange ellipses.
or maybe something like this:
init/calibrate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/calibrate.c b/init/calibrate.c
index cfd7000..827a45c 100644
--- a/init/calibrate.c
+++ b/init/calibrate.c
@@ -246,32 +246,38 @@ recalibrate:
return lpj;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_loops_per_jiffy) = { 0 };
+
void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
{
+ int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
static bool printed;
+ const char *msg;
- if (preset_lpj) {
+ if (per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu)) {
+ loops_per_jiffy = per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu);
+ msg = " CPU previously calibrated";
+ } else if (preset_lpj) {
loops_per_jiffy = preset_lpj;
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
- "preset value.. ");
+ msg = " preset value";
} else if ((!printed) && lpj_fine) {
loops_per_jiffy = lpj_fine;
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
- "value calculated using timer frequency.. ");
+ msg = " using timer frequency";
} else if ((loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_direct()) != 0) {
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay using timer "
- "specific routine.. ");
+ msg = " using timer specific routine";
} else {
- if (!printed)
- pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
+ pr_info("Calibrating delay loop...\n");
loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_converge();
+ per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu) = loops_per_jiffy;
+ msg = "";
}
- if (!printed)
- pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
+
+ if (!printed) {
+ pr_info("Delay loop calibration:%s %lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
+ msg,
loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
(loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100, loops_per_jiffy);
- printed = true;
+ printed = true;
+ }
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 23:19 [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done Sameer Nanda
2011-06-03 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 21:08 ` David Daney
2011-06-03 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 22:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2011-06-03 22:15 ` Sameer Nanda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307138409.14598.52.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
--cc=snanda@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox