From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com, Tim.Deegan@citrix.com,
jbeulich@novell.com, snanda@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:00:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110603140054.a0f1859d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306279146-23487-1-git-send-email-snanda@chromium.org>
On Tue, 24 May 2011 16:19:06 -0700
Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org> wrote:
> For each CPU, do the calibration delay only once. For subsequent calls,
> use the cached per-CPU value of loops_per_jiffy.
>
> This saves about 200ms of resume time on dual core Intel Atom N5xx based
> systems. This helps bring down the kernel resume time on such systems from
> about 500ms to about 300ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
> ---
> init/calibrate.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/calibrate.c b/init/calibrate.c
> index 76ac919..47d3408 100644
> --- a/init/calibrate.c
> +++ b/init/calibrate.c
> @@ -183,11 +183,18 @@ recalibrate:
> return lpj;
> }
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_loops_per_jiffy) = { 0 };
> +
> void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
> {
> static bool printed;
> + int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> - if (preset_lpj) {
> + if (per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu)) {
> + loops_per_jiffy = per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu);
> + pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
> + "already calibrated this CPU previously.. ");
> + } else if (preset_lpj) {
> loops_per_jiffy = preset_lpj;
> if (!printed)
> pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
> @@ -205,6 +212,7 @@ void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
> pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
> loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_converge();
> }
> + per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu) = loops_per_jiffy;
> if (!printed)
> pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
> loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
Seems reasonable.
On resume, the kernel will print "already calibrated this CPU
previously.." in all situations, such as when preset_lpj was set. I
don't see a problem with that.
Let's be nice to the namespace:
--- a/init/calibrate.c~init-skip-calibration-delay-if-previously-done-fix
+++ a/init/calibrate.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ recalibrate:
return lpj;
}
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_loops_per_jiffy) = { 0 };
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_loops_per_jiffy) = { 0 };
void __cpuinit calibrate_delay(void)
{
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 23:19 [PATCH] init: skip calibration delay if previously done Sameer Nanda
2011-06-03 21:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-06-03 21:08 ` David Daney
2011-06-03 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-03 22:00 ` Joe Perches
2011-06-03 22:15 ` Sameer Nanda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110603140054.a0f1859d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
--cc=snanda@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox