From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: New driver for the Intel 82801 (ICH) GPIO pins
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:02:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328220172.2261.162.camel@groeck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328212615.12622.193.camel@petert>
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:56 -0500, Peter Tyser wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > > > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 7
> > > > > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1
> > > > > drivers/gpio/i801_gpio.c | 432 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 440 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > Did this or an alternate patch for gpio support on the recent Intel ICHs go anywhere ?
> > > >
> > > > I found another patch which is using a different approach, but I don't see anything
> > > > in the latest kernel.
> > >
> > > I don't think any driver made it into the kernel, at least I can't find
> > > any in 3.3-rc2 nor linux-next. I'm not surprised, as neither driver was
> > > using the MFD framework while this would really be the right thing to
> > > do here. I never took the time to convert my driver to MFD and
> > > apparently Peter did not either. This is still on my to-do list but you
> > > know how long it is. If anyone is faster than me at getting the code is
> > > a shape suitable for upstream, I'll be happy to help with review and
> > > testing.
> > >
> > I'd love to take this on, but unfortunately my task list isn't getting
> > shorter either. Just bad that this doesn't seem to make it in.
> >
> > One reason of course may be that at least Peter's version tried to
> > accomplish too much. Looking through the comments, seems there was a
> > disagreement on unrelated issues such as if there should be a new
> > "unknown" gpio direction or not. Maybe it would make more sense to
> > separate the core patch to add ICH gpio support from the rest of Peter's
> > proposed changes.
>
> I agree with Jean, I believe the main issue it wasn't accepted was the
> fact that it didn't use the MFD framework. The driver I submitted
> follows the model of other drivers that share the same PCI device (iTCO,
> esb2rom, etc), so is functionally OK to use as is, it just doesn't use
> the recommend MFD framework, which was gating its acceptance.
>
> > Peter, do you have any plans to work on this in the near future ?
>
> I too have been caught up in other tasks. A co-worker recently created
> a patch to transition the ICHx gpio driver I wrote and other related
> drivers (esb2rom, iTCO, etc) to the MFD structure with the intention
> that it would eventually be merged upstream. The patch is still under
> review internally, but I'll talk to him about submitting it upstream.
Would you be willing to share your current code ? Even if it is too
early for upstream submission, you might get some testing and review
feedback.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 12:53 [PATCH] gpio: New driver for the Intel 82801 (ICH) GPIO pins Jean Delvare
2011-04-19 14:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-19 14:54 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-19 15:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-19 15:57 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-19 16:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-19 17:08 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-19 20:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-19 21:16 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-19 21:20 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-23 13:45 ` Jean Delvare
2011-04-23 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2011-05-19 11:33 ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-27 3:09 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-02 2:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-02 7:49 ` Jean Delvare
2012-02-02 17:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-02 19:56 ` Peter Tyser
2012-02-02 22:02 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2012-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Add LPC driver for Intel ICH chipsets Aaron Sierra
2012-02-03 6:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-03 15:34 ` Aaron Sierra
2012-02-03 19:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-03 19:35 ` Aaron Sierra
2012-02-03 19:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-03 22:50 ` Aaron Sierra
2012-02-04 8:45 ` Jean Delvare
2012-02-04 16:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-07 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Aaron Sierra
2012-02-07 20:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-07 20:31 ` Jean Delvare
2012-02-07 20:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-07 21:00 ` Aaron Sierra
2012-02-07 21:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-02 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpio: Add support for Intel ICHx/3100/Series[56] GPIO Aaron Sierra
2012-02-03 20:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] " Aaron Sierra
2012-02-07 20:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-07 22:07 ` Jean Delvare
2012-02-07 23:25 ` Aaron Sierra
2012-02-02 23:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: Convert iTCO_wdt driver to mfd model Aaron Sierra
2012-02-07 19:59 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Aaron Sierra
2012-02-07 21:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-08 17:48 ` Aaron Sierra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328220172.2261.162.camel@groeck-laptop \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox