* [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: Update to fully use irq_domain
@ 2012-05-13 18:57 Mark Brown
2012-05-14 21:07 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-13 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: linux-kernel, patches, Mark Brown
Take advantage of the new regmap irq_domain support to dynamically
allocate interrupts, using regmap_irq_get_virq() rather than irq_base
to look up the interrupts. This means that most users should not need
to specify an irq_base at all.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
The regmap-irq irq_domain support is only in -next, is it OK to merge
this via regmap? There's no massive urgency but it'd be nice.
drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c | 6 ------
include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c
index 46b20c4..f1837f6 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c
@@ -147,12 +147,6 @@ int wm8994_irq_init(struct wm8994 *wm8994)
return 0;
}
- if (!wm8994->irq_base) {
- dev_err(wm8994->dev,
- "No interrupt base specified, no interrupts\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(wm8994->regmap, wm8994->irq,
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
wm8994->irq_base, &wm8994_irq_chip,
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h
index d41bc7b..1f17330 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
enum wm8994_type {
WM8994 = 0,
@@ -26,7 +27,6 @@ enum wm8994_type {
struct regulator_dev;
struct regulator_bulk_data;
-struct regmap;
#define WM8994_NUM_GPIO_REGS 11
#define WM8994_NUM_LDO_REGS 2
@@ -95,17 +95,17 @@ static inline int wm8994_request_irq(struct wm8994 *wm8994, int irq,
irq_handler_t handler, const char *name,
void *data)
{
- if (!wm8994->irq_base)
+ if (!wm8994->irq_data)
return -EINVAL;
- return request_threaded_irq(wm8994->irq_base + irq, NULL, handler,
- IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, name,
+ return request_threaded_irq(regmap_irq_get_virq(wm8994->irq_data, irq),
+ NULL, handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, name,
data);
}
static inline void wm8994_free_irq(struct wm8994 *wm8994, int irq, void *data)
{
- if (!wm8994->irq_base)
+ if (!wm8994->irq_data)
return;
- free_irq(wm8994->irq_base + irq, data);
+ free_irq(regmap_irq_get_virq(wm8994->irq_data, irq), data);
}
int wm8994_irq_init(struct wm8994 *wm8994);
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: Update to fully use irq_domain
2012-05-13 18:57 [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: Update to fully use irq_domain Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-14 21:07 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2012-05-14 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel, patches
Hi Mark,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 07:57:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Take advantage of the new regmap irq_domain support to dynamically
> allocate interrupts, using regmap_irq_get_virq() rather than irq_base
> to look up the interrupts. This means that most users should not need
> to specify an irq_base at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>
> The regmap-irq irq_domain support is only in -next, is it OK to merge
> this via regmap? There's no massive urgency but it'd be nice.
Fine with me:
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-14 20:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-13 18:57 [PATCH] mfd: wm8994: Update to fully use irq_domain Mark Brown
2012-05-14 21:07 ` Samuel Ortiz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox