From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Enable PDIR precise instruction profiling on IvyBridge
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:36:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341265014.23484.47.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120702210008.GB14479@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 14:00 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ok so you want a new flag? Or a new event?
Once we grow the sysfs event stuff for cpu PMUs, we could add a new
named event, but I don't think its all that important.
instructions isn't all that interesting a measure to sample. And the
people that do care can already use it by filling out the event
manually.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-02 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-02 18:43 Updated and combined Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge perf patchkits Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Improve basic Ivy Bridge support v3 Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 19:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 19:58 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Enable PDIR precise instruction profiling on IvyBridge Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 19:57 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-02 21:00 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-07-02 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 23:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-07-03 4:04 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-05 15:45 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-07-05 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-06 1:04 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Do microcode updates at CPU_STARTING, not CPU_ONLINE v2 Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge v4 Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Spell Romley correctly Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-02 20:40 Another IvyBridge/SandyBridge patchkit Andi Kleen
2012-07-02 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Enable PDIR precise instruction profiling on IvyBridge Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1341265014.23484.47.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox