The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: airlied@gmail.com, airlied@redhat.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] kref: Implement kref_get_unless_zero v3
Date: Tue,  6 Nov 2012 12:31:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352201511-6383-3-git-send-email-thellstrom@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352201511-6383-1-git-send-email-thellstrom@vmware.com>

This function is intended to simplify locking around refcounting for
objects that can be looked up from a lookup structure, and which are
removed from that lookup structure in the object destructor.
Operations on such objects require at least a read lock around
lookup + kref_get, and a write lock around kref_put + remove from lookup
structure. Furthermore, RCU implementations become extremely tricky.
With a lookup followed by a kref_get_unless_zero *with return value check*
locking in the kref_put path can be deferred to the actual removal from
the lookup structure and RCU lookups become trivial.

v2: Formatting fixes.
v3: Invert the return value.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
---
 include/linux/kref.h |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kref.h b/include/linux/kref.h
index 65af688..4972e6e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kref.h
+++ b/include/linux/kref.h
@@ -111,4 +111,25 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct kref *kref,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/**
+ * kref_get_unless_zero - Increment refcount for object unless it is zero.
+ * @kref: object.
+ *
+ * Return non-zero if the increment succeeded. Otherwise return 0.
+ *
+ * This function is intended to simplify locking around refcounting for
+ * objects that can be looked up from a lookup structure, and which are
+ * removed from that lookup structure in the object destructor.
+ * Operations on such objects require at least a read lock around
+ * lookup + kref_get, and a write lock around kref_put + remove from lookup
+ * structure. Furthermore, RCU implementations become extremely tricky.
+ * With a lookup followed by a kref_get_unless_zero *with return value check*
+ * locking in the kref_put path can be deferred to the actual removal from
+ * the lookup structure and RCU lookups become trivial.
+ */
+static inline int __must_check kref_get_unless_zero(struct kref *kref)
+{
+	return atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, 1, 0);
+}
 #endif /* _KREF_H_ */
-- 
1.7.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-06 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-06 11:31 [PATCH 0/4] drm/ttm: Get rid of a number of atomic read-modify-write ops v3 Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-06 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm: Make hashtab rcu-safe Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-06 11:31 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2012-11-06 11:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm, drm/vmwgfx: Use RCU locking for object lookups v3 Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-20  6:19   ` Dave Airlie
2012-11-20  6:44     ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-20  7:59       ` Dave Airlie
2012-11-06 11:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Optimize reservation slightly Thomas Hellstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1352201511-6383-3-git-send-email-thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox