From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Constantine Shulyupin <const@makelinux.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: consolidate if (foo) bar(foo) checks and add debugfs_remove
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:37:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353436648.17387.3.camel@joe-AO722> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121120163956.GD17797@dm>
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 16:39 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:51:17AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:37 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > Consolidate the if (foo) bar(foo) detectors into a single check. Add
> > > debugfs_remove and family.
> > >
> > > Based on a patch by Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > []
> > >
> > > +# check for needless "if (<foo>) fn(<foo>)" uses
> > > + if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(\s*($Lval)\s*\)/) {
> > > + my $expr = '\s*\(\s*' . quotemeta($1) . '\s*\)\s*;';
> > > +
> > []
> > > +# check for needless debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive*() checks
> >
> > Hey Andy, that's an incomplete comment.
> > Just remove it.
>
> Oh it is meant to drop next to the other comments from the preceeding
> hunks which are being removed, it should end up looking like this:
>
> # check for needless kfree() checks
> # check for needless usb_free_urb() checks
> # check for needless debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive*() checks
>
> Admitedly the trailing checks on each are a little redundant, but it is
> intended to retain the list of functions affected.
I think all of those are unnecessary.
Self documenting code is better right?
If not, I'd remove the "check for needless", leave the function,
and remove the trailing "checks"
btw: the * after debugfs_remove_recursive should be removed too.
cheers, Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-20 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-17 22:20 [PATCH v4] checkpatch: debugfs_remove() can take NULL Constantine Shulyupin
2012-11-20 14:29 ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-11-20 14:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-11-20 14:47 ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-11-20 14:50 ` Constantine Shulyupin
2012-11-20 14:58 ` Joe Perches
2012-11-20 15:10 ` Constantine Shulyupin
2012-11-20 15:22 ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-11-20 20:57 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Allow control over line length warning, default remains 80 Joe Perches
2012-11-20 15:37 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: consolidate if (foo) bar(foo) checks and add debugfs_remove Andy Whitcroft
2012-11-20 15:51 ` Joe Perches
2012-11-20 16:39 ` Andy Whitcroft
2012-11-20 18:37 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2012-11-20 19:17 ` [PATCH V2] " Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353436648.17387.3.camel@joe-AO722 \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=const@makelinux.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox