From: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] perf, amd: Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:48:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353970111-4508-3-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353970111-4508-1-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com>
From: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 10h so that later
we can reuse the same code path with other AMD processor families that
have the same northbridge event constraints.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index d60c5c7..04ef43f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -188,20 +188,13 @@ static inline int amd_has_nb(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
return nb && nb->nb_id != -1;
}
-static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
- struct perf_event *event)
+static void __amd_put_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+ struct perf_event *event)
{
- struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
int i;
/*
- * only care about NB events
- */
- if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
- return;
-
- /*
* need to scan whole list because event may not have
* been assigned during scheduling
*
@@ -247,12 +240,13 @@ static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
*
* Given that resources are allocated (cmpxchg), they must be
* eventually freed for others to use. This is accomplished by
- * calling amd_put_event_constraints().
+ * calling __amd_put_nb_event_constraints()
*
* Non NB events are not impacted by this restriction.
*/
static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+__amd_get_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct event_constraint *c)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
@@ -260,12 +254,6 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
int idx, new = -1;
/*
- * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
- */
- if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
- return &unconstrained;
-
- /*
* detect if already present, if so reuse
*
* cannot merge with actual allocation
@@ -275,7 +263,7 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
* because of successive calls to x86_schedule_events() from
* hw_perf_group_sched_in() without hw_perf_enable()
*/
- for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) {
+ for_each_set_bit(idx, c->idxmsk, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
if (new == -1 || hwc->idx == idx)
/* assign free slot, prefer hwc->idx */
old = cmpxchg(nb->owners + idx, NULL, event);
@@ -391,6 +379,25 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
}
}
+static struct event_constraint *
+amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ /*
+ * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
+ */
+ if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw)))
+ return &unconstrained;
+
+ return __amd_get_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event, &unconstrained);
+}
+
+static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+ struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw))
+ __amd_put_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+}
+
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7,32-35");
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask, "config:8-15" );
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge, "config:18" );
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 22:48 [PATCH V3 0/5] perf, amd: Enable AMD family 15h northbridge counters Jacob Shin
2012-11-26 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, amd: Rework northbridge event constraints handler Jacob Shin
2012-11-26 22:48 ` Jacob Shin [this message]
2012-11-26 22:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Move MSR address offset calculation to architecture specific files Jacob Shin
2012-11-26 22:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, amd: Enable northbridge performance counters on AMD family 15h Jacob Shin
2012-11-27 12:10 ` Robert Richter
2012-11-27 16:37 ` Jacob Shin
2012-11-26 22:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, amd: Use proper naming scheme for AMD bit field definitions Jacob Shin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353970111-4508-3-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com \
--to=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox