From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] TTY: synclink, small cleanup in dtr_rts()
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:00:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359320401.14406.16.camel@joe-AO722> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130127201947.GO16282@mwanda>
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 23:19 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:04:38PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be clearer still to use | instead of +
> Yeah. I think it would be, but adding bitflags together instead of
> doing bitwise ORs is very common as well.
Fortunately, less and less so.
Another option might be to add another #define
to include/uapi/linux/synclink.h
#define SerialSignal_DTR_RTS (SerialSignal_DTR | SerialSignal_RTS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-27 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-27 19:40 [patch] TTY: synclink, small cleanup in dtr_rts() Dan Carpenter
2013-01-27 20:04 ` Joe Perches
2013-01-27 20:16 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-27 20:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-01-27 21:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
[not found] ` <C8AFB2C4-4974-4265-A41C-A56C71784F39@microgate.com>
2013-01-28 2:21 ` [PATCH] TTY: synclink: Convert + to | for bit operations Joe Perches
2013-01-28 12:06 ` [patch] TTY: synclink, small cleanup in dtr_rts() walter harms
2013-01-29 15:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-01-29 16:13 ` coccinelle and bitmask arithmetic (was: Re: [patch] TTY: synclink, small cleanup in dtr_rts()) Joe Perches
2013-01-29 16:19 ` Julia Lawall
2013-01-29 16:31 ` Joe Perches
2013-01-29 17:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-01-29 17:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-01-29 17:49 ` Julia Lawall
2013-01-29 18:03 ` Joe Perches
2013-01-30 8:21 ` coccinelle and bitmask arithmetic walter harms
2013-01-30 8:29 ` Joe Perches
2013-01-30 11:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-30 11:21 ` Julia Lawall
2013-01-30 11:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-30 16:53 ` Joe Perches
2013-01-30 18:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 18:38 ` coccinelle and bitmask arithmetic (was: Re: [patch] TTY: synclink, small cleanup in dtr_rts()) Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359320401.14406.16.camel@joe-AO722 \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulkf@microgate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox