public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:18:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359728280.8360.15.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350408232.2336.42.camel@laptop>

Hello,

I'd like to revive the topic...

On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 18:23 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 12:13 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > There are many situations where we want to correlate events happening at
> > the user level with samples recorded in the perf_event kernel sampling buffer.
> > For instance, we might want to correlate the call to a function or creation of
> > a file with samples. Similarly, when we want to monitor a JVM with jitted code,
> > we need to be able to correlate jitted code mappings with perf event samples
> > for symbolization.
> > 
> > Perf_events allows timestamping of samples with PERF_SAMPLE_TIME.
> > That causes each PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE to include a timestamp
> > generated by calling the local_clock() -> sched_clock_cpu() function.
> > 
> > To make correlating user vs. kernel samples easy, we would need to
> > access that sched_clock() functionality. However, none of the existing
> > clock calls permit this at this point. They all return timestamps which are
> > not using the same source and/or offset as sched_clock.
> > 
> > I believe a similar issue exists with the ftrace subsystem.
> > 
> > The problem needs to be adressed in a portable manner. Solutions
> > based on reading TSC for the user level to reconstruct sched_clock()
> > don't seem appropriate to me.
> > 
> > One possibility to address this limitation would be to extend clock_gettime()
> > with a new clock time, e.g., CLOCK_PERF.
> > 
> > However, I understand that sched_clock_cpu() provides ordering guarantees only
> > when invoked on the same CPU repeatedly, i.e., it's not globally synchronized.
> > But we already have to deal with this problem when merging samples obtained
> > from different CPU sampling buffer in per-thread mode. So this is not
> > necessarily
> > a showstopper.
> > 
> > Alternatives could be to use uprobes but that's less practical to setup.
> > 
> > Anyone with better ideas?
> 
> You forgot to CC the time people ;-)
> 
> I've no problem with adding CLOCK_PERF (or another/better name).
> 
> Thomas, John?

I've just faced the same issue - correlating an event in userspace with
data from the perf stream, but to my mind what I want to get is a value
returned by perf_clock() _in the current "session" context_.

Stephane didn't like the idea of opening a "fake" perf descriptor in
order to get the timestamp, but surely one must have the "session"
already running to be interested in such data in the first place? So I
think the ioctl() idea is not out of place here... How about the simple
change below?

Regards

Pawel

8<---
>From 2ad51a27fbf64bf98cee190efc3fbd7002819692 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:03:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Add ioctl to return current time value

To co-relate user space events with the perf events stream
a current (as in: "what time(stamp) is it now?") time value
must be made available.

This patch adds a perf ioctl that makes this possible.

Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h |    1 +
 kernel/events/core.c            |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 4f63c05..b745fb0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
 #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD		_IOW('$', 4, __u64)
 #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT	_IO ('$', 5)
 #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER	_IOW('$', 6, char *)
+#define PERF_EVENT_IOC_GET_TIME		_IOR('$', 7, __u64)
 
 enum perf_event_ioc_flags {
 	PERF_IOC_FLAG_GROUP		= 1U << 0,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 301079d..4202b1c 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3298,6 +3298,14 @@ static long perf_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 	case PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER:
 		return perf_event_set_filter(event, (void __user *)arg);
 
+	case PERF_EVENT_IOC_GET_TIME:
+	{
+		u64 time = perf_clock();
+		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &time, sizeof(time)))
+			return -EFAULT;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	default:
 		return -ENOTTY;
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 10:13 [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples Stephane Eranian
2012-10-16 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-18 19:33   ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-10  2:04   ` John Stultz
2012-11-11 20:32     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 18:53       ` John Stultz
2012-11-12 20:54         ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 22:39           ` John Stultz
2012-11-13 20:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-11-14 22:26       ` John Stultz
2012-11-14 23:30         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-01 14:18   ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-02-05 21:18     ` David Ahern
2013-02-05 22:13     ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-05 22:28       ` John Stultz
2013-02-06  1:19         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-06 18:17           ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 20:00             ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-14 10:33               ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-18 15:16                 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-18 18:59                   ` David Ahern
2013-02-18 20:35         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 18:25           ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 19:55             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:15               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:35                 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 21:50                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 22:20                     ` John Stultz
2013-02-20 10:06                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-20 10:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-23  6:04               ` John Stultz
2013-02-25 14:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-14 15:34                   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-03-14 19:57                     ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-31 16:23                       ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 18:29                         ` John Stultz
2013-04-01 22:29                           ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 23:12                             ` John Stultz
2013-04-03  9:17                             ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 13:55                               ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:00                                 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 14:14                                   ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:22                                     ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 17:57                                       ` John Stultz
2013-04-04  8:12                                         ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-04 22:26                                           ` John Stultz
2013-04-02  7:54                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 16:05                             ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-02 16:19                             ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 16:34                               ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:19                               ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:29                                 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 17:35                                   ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:50                                     ` John Stultz
2013-04-04  7:37                                       ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-04 16:33                                         ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-04 16:29                                       ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-05 18:16                                         ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-06 11:05                                           ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-08 17:58                                             ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-08 19:05                                               ` John Stultz
2013-04-09  5:02                                                 ` Richard Cochran
2013-02-06 18:17       ` Pawel Moll
2013-06-26 16:49     ` David Ahern
2013-07-15 10:44       ` Pawel Moll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359728280.8360.15.camel@hornet \
    --to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox