public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:57:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363291021.3100.144.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBS4TELhoUGrO+moca2fPUoqGjiYCdHJc=H8CjLomPWWDQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 15:34 +0000, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Well, the timestamps themselves are already exposed to userspace
> > through the ftrace and perf data logs. All people want is to add
> > secondary data stream in the same time-line.
> >
> I agree with Peter on this. The timestamps are already visible.
> All we need is the ability to generate them for another user-level
> level data stream.

Ok, how about the code below? I must say I have some doubts about the
resolution, as there seem to be no generic way of figuring it out for
the sched_clock (the arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c is actually
calculating it, but than just prints it out and nothing more).

And, to summarize, we went through 3 ideas:

1. ioctl() - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1433933
2. syscall - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1437057
3. POSIX clock - below

John also suggested that maybe the perf could use CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW
instead of local/sched_clock().

How about a final decision?

Regards

Pawel

8<--------------------
>From c986492d38156f1fc25ab3182f0a494bb13389ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:49:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] perf: POSIX CLOCK_PERF to report current time value

To co-relate user space events with the perf events stream
a current (as in: "what time(stamp) is it now?") time value
must be made available.

This patch adds a POSIX clock returning the perf_clock()
value and accesible from userspace:

	#include <time.h>

	struct timespec ts;

	clock_gettime(CLOCK_PERF, &ts);

Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/time.h |    1 +
 kernel/events/core.c      |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/time.h b/include/uapi/linux/time.h
index 0d3c0ed..cea16b0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/time.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct itimerval {
 #define CLOCK_BOOTTIME			7
 #define CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM		8
 #define CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM		9
+#define CLOCK_PERF			10
 
 /*
  * The IDs of various hardware clocks:
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index b0cd865..81ca459 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <linux/ftrace_event.h>
 #include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
 #include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -209,6 +210,19 @@ static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
 	return local_clock();
 }
 
+static int perf_posix_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock,
+		struct timespec *tp)
+{
+	*tp = ns_to_timespec(TICK_NSEC);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int perf_posix_clock_get(clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *tp)
+{
+	*tp = ns_to_timespec(perf_clock());
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline struct perf_cpu_context *
 __get_cpu_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 {
@@ -7391,6 +7405,10 @@ perf_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 
 void __init perf_event_init(void)
 {
+	struct k_clock perf_posix_clock = {
+		.clock_getres = perf_posix_clock_getres,
+		.clock_get = perf_posix_clock_get,
+	};
 	int ret;
 
 	idr_init(&pmu_idr);
@@ -7407,6 +7425,8 @@ void __init perf_event_init(void)
 	ret = init_hw_breakpoint();
 	WARN(ret, "hw_breakpoint initialization failed with: %d", ret);
 
+	posix_timers_register_clock(CLOCK_PERF, &perf_posix_clock);
+
 	/* do not patch jump label more than once per second */
 	jump_label_rate_limit(&perf_sched_events, HZ);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4





  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 10:13 [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples Stephane Eranian
2012-10-16 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-18 19:33   ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-10  2:04   ` John Stultz
2012-11-11 20:32     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 18:53       ` John Stultz
2012-11-12 20:54         ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 22:39           ` John Stultz
2012-11-13 20:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-11-14 22:26       ` John Stultz
2012-11-14 23:30         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-01 14:18   ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-05 21:18     ` David Ahern
2013-02-05 22:13     ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-05 22:28       ` John Stultz
2013-02-06  1:19         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-06 18:17           ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 20:00             ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-14 10:33               ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-18 15:16                 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-18 18:59                   ` David Ahern
2013-02-18 20:35         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 18:25           ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 19:55             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:15               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:35                 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 21:50                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 22:20                     ` John Stultz
2013-02-20 10:06                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-20 10:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-23  6:04               ` John Stultz
2013-02-25 14:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-14 15:34                   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-03-14 19:57                     ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-03-31 16:23                       ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 18:29                         ` John Stultz
2013-04-01 22:29                           ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 23:12                             ` John Stultz
2013-04-03  9:17                             ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 13:55                               ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:00                                 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 14:14                                   ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:22                                     ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 17:57                                       ` John Stultz
2013-04-04  8:12                                         ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-04 22:26                                           ` John Stultz
2013-04-02  7:54                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 16:05                             ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-02 16:19                             ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 16:34                               ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:19                               ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:29                                 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 17:35                                   ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:50                                     ` John Stultz
2013-04-04  7:37                                       ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-04 16:33                                         ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-04 16:29                                       ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-05 18:16                                         ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-06 11:05                                           ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-08 17:58                                             ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-08 19:05                                               ` John Stultz
2013-04-09  5:02                                                 ` Richard Cochran
2013-02-06 18:17       ` Pawel Moll
2013-06-26 16:49     ` David Ahern
2013-07-15 10:44       ` Pawel Moll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363291021.3100.144.camel@hornet \
    --to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox