public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:48:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373500106.24916.13.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6189099.QeK4PsCIFb@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 00:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 02:11:05 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 01:32:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 02:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
> > > > entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
> > > > represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
> > > > just have been added).
> > > > 
> > > > For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
> > > > acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
> > > > ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> > > 
> > > But, I think we need the additional patch below.
> > 
> > Yes, I think you're right.
> 
> That said I'd prefer to put the check into acpi_bus_device_attach() like in
> the appended patch.

That's fine by me.  

Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Just a minor point, though.  Isn't it a bit inconsistent with
device_attach(), which checks dev->driver inside the function?  That
said, I am OK with either way.

Thanks,
-Toshi


> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: ACPI / scan: Do not try to attach scan handlers to devices having them
> 
> In acpi_bus_device_attach(), if there is an ACPI device object
> for the given handle and that device object has a scan handler
> attached to it already, there's nothing more to do for that handle
> and the function should just return success immediately.  Make
> that happen.
> 
> Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
>  	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
>  		return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
>  
> +	if (device->handler)
> +		return AE_OK;
> +
>  	ret = acpi_scan_attach_handler(device);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret > 0 ? AE_OK : AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-10 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08  0:10 [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-09 19:32 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-10  0:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-10 22:45     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-10 23:48       ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-07-11  0:39         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-11 16:15           ` Toshi Kani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1373500106.24916.13.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox