From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:45:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6189099.QeK4PsCIFb@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19368029.jaCH7i2zvY@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 02:11:05 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 01:32:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 02:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >
> > > An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
> > > entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
> > > represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
> > > just have been added).
> > >
> > > For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
> > > acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
> > > ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> >
> > But, I think we need the additional patch below.
>
> Yes, I think you're right.
That said I'd prefer to put the check into acpi_bus_device_attach() like in
the appended patch.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: ACPI / scan: Do not try to attach scan handlers to devices having them
In acpi_bus_device_attach(), if there is an ACPI device object
for the given handle and that device object has a scan handler
attached to it already, there's nothing more to do for that handle
and the function should just return success immediately. Make
that happen.
Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
+ if (device->handler)
+ return AE_OK;
+
ret = acpi_scan_attach_handler(device);
if (ret)
return ret > 0 ? AE_OK : AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 0:10 [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-09 19:32 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-10 0:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-10 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-07-10 23:48 ` Toshi Kani
2013-07-11 0:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-11 16:15 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6189099.QeK4PsCIFb@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox