public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <pjt@google.com>,
	<oleg@redhat.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, <tkhai@yandex.ru>,
	<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
	<nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] sched: Teach scheduler to understand ONRQ_MIGRATING state
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:34:23 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407832463.23412.2.camel@tkhai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812075523.GN9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

В Вт, 12/08/2014 в 09:55 +0200, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:06:19PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -331,9 +331,13 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
> >  
> >  	for (;;) {
> > +		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> > +			cpu_relax();
> > +
> >  		rq = task_rq(p);
> >  		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> > -		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p)))
> > +		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) &&
> > +			   !task_migrating(p)))
> >  			return rq;
> >  		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> >  	}
> > @@ -349,10 +353,14 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
> >  	struct rq *rq;
> >  
> >  	for (;;) {
> > +		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> > +			cpu_relax();
> > +
> >  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
> >  		rq = task_rq(p);
> >  		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> > -		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p)))
> > +		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) &&
> > +			   !task_migrating(p)))
> >  			return rq;
> >  		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> >  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
> 
> I know I suggested that; but I changed it like the below. The advantage
> is of not having two task_migrating() tests on the likely path.

I don't have objections. Should I resend the series (also with new [4/6] log
commentary)?

> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -331,15 +331,15 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
>  
>  	for (;;) {
> -		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> -			cpu_relax();
> -
>  		rq = task_rq(p);
>  		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
>  		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) &&
>  			   !task_migrating(p)))
>  			return rq;
>  		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> +
> +		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> +			cpu_relax();
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -353,9 +353,6 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct ta
>  	struct rq *rq;
>  
>  	for (;;) {
> -		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> -			cpu_relax();
> -
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
>  		rq = task_rq(p);
>  		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> @@ -364,6 +361,9 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct ta
>  			return rq;
>  		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
> +
> +		while (unlikely(task_migrating(p)))
> +			cpu_relax();
>  	}
>  }
>  



  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140806075138.24858.23816.stgit@tkhai>
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] sched/fair: Fix reschedule which is generated on throttled cfs_rq Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20  8:20   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-23 23:27   ` [PATCH v4 1/6] " Wanpeng Li
2014-10-24  6:01     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-24  9:32       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-24 15:12         ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20  7:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] sched: Teach scheduler to understand ONRQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  7:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  8:34     ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-08-12  9:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  8:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06  8:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  9:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  9:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12  9:39     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-06  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-12  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 10:27     ` Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407832463.23412.2.camel@tkhai \
    --to=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox