Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Move __task_rq_{, un}lock() to kernel/sched/sched.h

[Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>]

В Вт, 17/02/2015 в 12:26 +0100, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:51PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > 
> > > Place it in sched.h, because dl_task_timer() needs it.
> > > Also remove lockdep check, which is not fit to this
> > > function.
> > 
> > No, that lockdep check is valid for all current sites.
> 
> Also, note that you just proved the reason we didn't have pi_lock there
> wrong the other day.
> 
> As per 0f397f2c90ce ("sched/dl: Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):
> 
>        "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
>         we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
>         thus free of ttwu races".
> 
> And therefore we should use the full task_rq_lock() here.
> 

So, we move task_rq_lock() to sched.h, and dl_task_timer() uses it?