public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:31:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217123139.GN5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424172838.5749.27.camel@tkhai>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:33:58PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:

> So, we move task_rq_lock() to sched.h, and dl_task_timer() uses it?

Yep, like this. I've also modified your earlier patch to dl_task_time()
back to its original form.

---
Subject: sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Feb 17 13:22:25 CET 2015

Kirill reported that a dl task can be throttled and dequeued at the
same time. This happens, when it becomes throttled in schedule(),
which is called to go to sleep:

current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule()
    deactivate_task()
        dequeue_task_dl()
            update_curr_dl()
                start_dl_timer()
            __dequeue_task_dl()
    prev->on_rq = 0;

This invalidates the assumption from commit 0f397f2c90ce ("sched/dl:
Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):

  "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
   we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
   thus free of ttwu races".

And therefore we have to use the full task_rq_lock() here.

This further amends the fact that we forgot to update the rq lock loop
for TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATE, from commit cca26e8009d1 ("sched: Teach
scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state").

Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |   76 ------------------------------------------------
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |   12 +------
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -307,82 +307,6 @@ __read_mostly int scheduler_running;
 int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
 
 /*
- * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on.
- */
-static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
-	__acquires(rq->lock)
-{
-	struct rq *rq;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
-
-	for (;;) {
-		rq = task_rq(p);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
-		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			return rq;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-
-		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			cpu_relax();
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on.
- */
-static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
-	__acquires(p->pi_lock)
-	__acquires(rq->lock)
-{
-	struct rq *rq;
-
-	for (;;) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-		rq = task_rq(p);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
-		/*
-		 *	move_queued_task()		task_rq_lock()
-		 *
-		 *	ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
-		 *	[S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING		[L] rq = task_rq()
-		 *	WMB (__set_task_cpu())		ACQUIRE (rq->lock);
-		 *	[S] ->cpu = new_cpu		[L] task_rq()
-		 *					[L] ->on_rq
-		 *	RELEASE (rq->lock)
-		 *
-		 * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of
-		 * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores.
-		 *
-		 * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will
-		 * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating.
-		 */
-		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			return rq;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-
-		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
-			cpu_relax();
-	}
-}
-
-static void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
-	__releases(rq->lock)
-{
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-}
-
-static inline void
-task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
-	__releases(rq->lock)
-	__releases(p->pi_lock)
-{
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
-}
-
-/*
  * this_rq_lock - lock this runqueue and disable interrupts.
  */
 static struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -511,16 +511,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_time
 						     struct sched_dl_entity,
 						     dl_timer);
 	struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rq *rq;
-again:
-	rq = task_rq(p);
-	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
 
-	if (rq != task_rq(p)) {
-		/* Task was moved, retrying. */
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-		goto again;
-	}
+	rq = task_rq_lock(current, &flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * We need to take care of several possible races here:
@@ -555,7 +549,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_time
 		push_dl_task(rq);
 #endif
 unlock:
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	task_rq_unlock(rq, current, &flags);
 
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1484,6 +1484,82 @@ static inline void double_raw_lock(raw_s
 }
 
 /*
+ * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on.
+ */
+static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p)
+	__acquires(rq->lock)
+{
+	struct rq *rq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		rq = task_rq(p);
+		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			return rq;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+
+		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			cpu_relax();
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on.
+ */
+static inline struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
+	__acquires(p->pi_lock)
+	__acquires(rq->lock)
+{
+	struct rq *rq;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+		rq = task_rq(p);
+		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		/*
+		 *	move_queued_task()		task_rq_lock()
+		 *
+		 *	ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
+		 *	[S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING		[L] rq = task_rq()
+		 *	WMB (__set_task_cpu())		ACQUIRE (rq->lock);
+		 *	[S] ->cpu = new_cpu		[L] task_rq()
+		 *					[L] ->on_rq
+		 *	RELEASE (rq->lock)
+		 *
+		 * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of
+		 * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores.
+		 *
+		 * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will
+		 * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating.
+		 */
+		if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			return rq;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+
+		while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p)))
+			cpu_relax();
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq)
+	__releases(rq->lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void
+task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags)
+	__releases(rq->lock)
+	__releases(p->pi_lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags);
+}
+
+/*
  * double_rq_lock - safely lock two runqueues
  *
  * Note this does not disable interrupts like task_rq_lock,

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-17 10:46 [PATCH 1/2] sched: Move __task_rq_{, un}lock() to kernel/sched/sched.h Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 11:20   ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 11:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 11:33     ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:31       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-02-17 13:32         ` [PATCH] sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 17:06         ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150217123139.GN5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox