The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	hpa@zytor.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:46:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143a5451-c7cf-16a5-a7ef-8c4b0633b689@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df1a1b5b-3e8b-5d96-12df-25be30c391af@intel.com>

On 2018/12/12 1:18, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/10/18 4:24 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
>> The tracking turns on the usage flag at the next context switch of
>> the task, but requires 3 consecutive context switches with no usage
>> to clear it. This decay is required because well-written AVX-512
>> applications are expected to clear this state when not actively using
>> AVX-512 registers.
> 
> One concern about this:  Given a HZ=1000 system, this means that the
> flag needs to get scanned every ~3ms.  That's a pretty good amount of
> scanning on a system with hundreds or thousands of tasks running around.
> 
> How many tasks does this scale to until you're eating up an entire CPU
> or two just scanning /proc?
> 

Do we have a real requirement to do this in practical environment?
AFAIK, 1s or even 5s is good enough in some customers environment.

Thanks,
-Aubrey

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-11 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11  0:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks Aubrey Li
2018-12-11  0:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] proc: add AVX-512 usage to /proc/pid/status Aubrey Li
2018-12-11 17:57   ` Tim Chen
2018-12-11 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks Dave Hansen
2018-12-11 17:52   ` Tim Chen
2018-12-11 17:53   ` Andi Kleen
2018-12-11 23:46   ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2018-12-12  0:14     ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-12-12  0:59       ` Li, Aubrey
2018-12-12  1:06         ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-11 17:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-12  0:34   ` Li, Aubrey
2018-12-12  0:39     ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-12 16:55 ` David Laight
2018-12-12 18:00   ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143a5451-c7cf-16a5-a7ef-8c4b0633b689@linux.intel.com \
    --to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox