From: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, saipraka@codeaurora.org, agross@kernel.org
Cc: tsoni@codeaurora.org, sidgup@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC 09/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Improve SMC convention detection
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:40:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572378065-4490-10-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572378065-4490-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org>
- Use enum to describe SMC convention.
- Improve SMC convention detection to use __qcom_scm_is_call_available
instead of circumventing qcom_scm_call_smccc.
- Improve SMC convention detection to check that SMCCC-32 works, instead
of just assuming it does of SMCCC-64 does not.
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
index c83eb1d..4d7fd3e 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
@@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ struct arm_smccc_args {
unsigned long a[8];
};
-static u64 qcom_smccc_convention = -1;
+enum qcom_smc_convention {
+ SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN,
+ SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32,
+ SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64,
+};
+
+static enum qcom_smc_convention qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
#define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS 30
@@ -103,7 +109,9 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev,
smc.a[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(
atomic ? ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL : ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL,
- qcom_smccc_convention,
+ (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64) ?
+ ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64 :
+ ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,
desc->owner,
SMCCC_FUNCNUM(desc->svc, desc->cmd));
smc.a[1] = desc->arginfo;
@@ -117,7 +125,7 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev,
if (!args_virt)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (qcom_smccc_convention == ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32) {
+ if (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32) {
__le32 *args = args_virt;
for (i = 0; i < SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS; i++)
@@ -579,19 +587,15 @@ int __qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle(struct device *dev, bool en)
void __qcom_scm_init(void)
{
- u64 cmd;
- struct arm_smccc_res res;
- u32 function = SMCCC_FUNCNUM(QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL);
-
/* First try a SMC64 call */
- cmd = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,
- ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, function);
-
- arm_smccc_smc(cmd, QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1), cmd & (~BIT(ARM_SMCCC_TYPE_SHIFT)),
- 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
-
- if (!res.a0 && res.a1)
- qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64;
- else
- qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32;
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64;
+ if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
+ QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) {
+ /* Now try a SMC32 call */
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32;
+ if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
+ QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) {
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN;
+ }
+ }
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-29 19:40 [RFC 00/17] Restructure, improve target support for qcom_scm driver Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 01/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Rename macros and structures Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 02/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Apply consistent naming scheme to command IDs Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 03/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Order functions, definitions by service/command Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 04/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Remove unused qcom_scm_get_version Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 05/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move svc/cmd/owner into qcom_scm_desc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 06/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add SCM results to descriptor Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 07/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Remove qcom_scm_call_do_smccc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 08/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move SMC register filling to qcom_scm_call_smccc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` Elliot Berman [this message]
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 10/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use SMC arch wrappers Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 11/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use qcom_scm_desc in non-atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 12/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Move SMCCC register filling to qcom_scm_call Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 13/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Create common legacy atomic call Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 14/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Add device argument to atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 15/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Merge legacy and SMCCC conventions Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 16/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Enable legacy calling convention in qcom_scm-64.c Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 17/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Rename -64 -> -smc, remove -32 Elliot Berman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1572378065-4490-10-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org \
--to=eberman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saipraka@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox