* [x86 question] invalid conversion of bootloader_type and bootloader_version ??
@ 2014-02-13 5:59 Jongman Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jongman Heo @ 2014-02-13 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 1033 bytes --]
Hi, all,
While looking at x86 boot code (arch/x86/kernel/setup.c), I got confused due to bootloader_type and bootloader_version conversion.
I've only checked GRUB and U-Boot bootloader code.
1. GRUB 2
type_of_loader setting = 0x72
-> bootloader_type = 0x72, bootloader_version = 0x2
2. U-Boot
type_of_loader setting = 0x8
-> bootloader_type = 0x8, bootloader_version = 0x8
3. example in Documentation/x86/boot.txt
type_of_loader = 0xE4, ext_loader_type = 0x05, ext_loader_ver = 0x23, for T = 0x15, V = 0x234
-> bootloader_type = 0x154, bootloader_version = 0x234
So, for GRUB 2 and the example bootloader, T != bootloader_type.
Is this intended?
First I thought that bootloader_type and bootloader_version should match with T and V configured in the bootloader.
This would not bring any real world issue, but I'm just curious.
Regards,
Jongman Heo.
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-02-13 5:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-13 5:59 [x86 question] invalid conversion of bootloader_type and bootloader_version ?? Jongman Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox