* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-12-30 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-30 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-12-30 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 07:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-30 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-30 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
2024-12-30 20:58 ` Shuah Khan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-12-30 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here (obsvx2 target is down, as
is one of bb targets):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.12.y
6.6 passes our testing, too:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.6.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-30 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-30 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-12-30 20:58 ` Shuah Khan
2024-12-30 23:57 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-12-30 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 12/30/24 08:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-30 20:58 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-12-30 23:57 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2024-12-31 8:01 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2024-12-30 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Hi Greg
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 12:54 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
6.12.8-rc1 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.12.8-rc1rv
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240910, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.43.0) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Dec 31 08:05:25 JST 2024
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-30 23:57 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2024-12-31 8:01 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-01-16 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2024-12-31 9:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-12-31 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 8:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
OVERVIEW
Builds: 41 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 580 passed, 1 failed
CI systems: broonie, maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.12.7-115-ged0d55fbe89cd
hash: ed0d55fbe89cd97180e55170f9f3907b2aa5f91d
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
BUILDS
No build failures found
BOOT TESTS
Failures
arm64:(defconfig)
-mt8186-corsola-steelix-sku131072
[ 6.051924] Device 'adsp_top' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst.
[ 6.064309] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 74 at drivers/base/core.c:2569 device_release+0x170/0x1e8
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/test/test?var-datasource=edquppk2ghfcwc&var-origin=maestro&var-build_architecture=$__all&var-build_config_name=$__all&var-id=maestro:67731b7b423acf18d2654a3c&from=now-100y&to=now&timezone=browser&var-test_path=&var-issue_presence=$__all
CI system: maestro
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=ed0d55fbe89cd97180e55170f9f3907b2aa5f91d&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-31 8:01 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-01-16 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-01-16 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1557 bytes --]
Hi!
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> > There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> BOOT TESTS
>
> Failures
>
> arm64:(defconfig)
> -mt8186-corsola-steelix-sku131072
> [ 6.051924] Device 'adsp_top' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/core-api/kobject.rst.
> [ 6.064309] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 74 at drivers/base/core.c:2569 device_release+0x170/0x1e8
...
> See complete and up-to-date report at:
>
> https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=ed0d55fbe89cd97180e55170f9f3907b2aa5f91d&var-patchset_hash=
>
> Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
I believe we usualy don't add "tested-by" tag when we detect failure.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 8:01 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2024-12-31 9:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-12-31 9:42 ` Markus Reichelt
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-12-31 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 at 21:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.12.8-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ed0d55fbe89cd97180e55170f9f3907b2aa5f91d
* git describe: v6.12.7-115-ged0d55fbe89c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.7-115-ged0d55fbe89c
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.6-161-gc157915828d8)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.6-161-gc157915828d8)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.6-161-gc157915828d8)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.6-161-gc157915828d8)
## Test result summary
total: 106218, pass: 84898, fail: 4380, skip: 16940, xfail: 0
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 143 total, 137 passed, 6 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 56 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 22 total, 19 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 38 total, 33 passed, 5 failed
* parisc: 5 total, 3 passed, 2 failed
* powerpc: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 24 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* sparc: 5 total, 3 passed, 2 failed
* x86_64: 50 total, 49 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 9:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-12-31 9:42 ` Markus Reichelt
2024-12-31 19:10 ` Markus Reichelt
2024-12-31 13:02 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Markus Reichelt @ 2024-12-31 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-kernel
* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg
6.12.8-rc1 compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, Slackware64-15.0)
Tested-by: Markus Reichelt <lkt+2023@mareichelt.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-31 9:42 ` Markus Reichelt
@ 2024-12-31 19:10 ` Markus Reichelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Markus Reichelt @ 2024-12-31 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-kernel
* Markus Reichelt <lkt+2023@mareichelt.com> wrote:
> * Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> > There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Hi Greg
>
> 6.12.8-rc1 compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
> (AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, Slackware64-15.0)
heads up, there seems to be something wrong with -rc1
on the lappy (Vivobook Go E1504FA) I got this:
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM sdma0:drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:amdgpu_device_delay_enable_gfx_off [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1734 at kernel/workqueue.c:3704 check_flush_dependency+0xfa/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Modules linked in: 8021q garp mrp stp llc qrtr algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg cmac bnep ipv6 zram uvcvideo uvc videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 btusb videobuf2_common btrtl btintel btbcm videodev btmtk bluetooth mc usbhid joydev intel_rapl_msr snd_soc_acp6x_mach snd_soc_dmic snd_acp6x_pdm_dma snd_ctl_led amdgpu snd_sof_amd_renoir snd_sof_amd_acp snd_sof_pci snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_sof_xtensa_dsp snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_scodec_component snd_sof snd_sof_utils snd_hda_codec_hdmi hid_multitouch hid_generic snd_soc_core amdxcp amd_atl drm_exec rtw88_8821ce snd_compress snd_hda_intel gpu_sched rtw88_8821c intel_rapl_common snd_pcm_dmaengine drm_buddy snd_intel_dspcfg rtw88_pci drm_suballoc_helper snd_intel_sdw_acpi snd_hda_codec drm_ttm_helper asus_nb_wmi edac_mce_amd ac97_bus snd_hda_core ttm rtw88_core asus_wmi crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul sparse_keymap evdev wmi_bmof platform_profile mac80211 drm_display_helper snd_hwdep snd_pci_acp6x i2c_hid_acpi ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] i2c_hid snd_pcm sha256_ssse3 drm_kms_helper hid sha1_ssse3 cfg80211 snd_timer snd_pci_acp5x xhci_pci snd_rn_pci_acp3x drm rapl serio_raw agpgart snd snd_acp_config i2c_algo_bit rfkill snd_soc_acpi xhci_hcd mfd_core snd_pci_acp3x soundcore i2c_piix4 k10temp i2c_smbus i2c_designware_platform tpm_crb tiny_power_button tpm_tis video ccp tpm_tis_core button i2c_designware_core i2c_core amd_pmc wmi loop(O) efivarfs
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1734 Comm: kworker/u32:6 Tainted: G O 6.12.8-rc1-jg71 #1
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA/E1504FA, BIOS E1504FA.309 12/26/2023
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Workqueue: sdma0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0xfa/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Code: ff ff 49 8b 55 18 48 8d 8b c0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48 81 c6 c0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 50 96 e9 92 c6 05 90 35 3d 02 01 e8 66 ab fd ff <0f> 0b e9 21 ff ff ff 80 3d 7e 35 3d 02 00 75 96 e9 4d ff ff ff 90
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] RSP: 0018:ffffbf038050bc88 EFLAGS: 00010086
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9d9040050c00 RCX: 0000000000000000
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff92ea9253 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] RBP: ffffffffc0e8cb00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffbf038050bb20
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] R10: ffffbf038050bb18 R11: ffff9d934e3fffe8 R12: ffff9d9048ef4ec0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] R13: ffff9d9043e0d3c0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff9d934e733ac0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d934e880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] CR2: 00007f0e70000020 CR3: 00000003ff244000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] Call Trace:
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] <TASK>
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __warn+0x84/0x130
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? check_flush_dependency+0xfa/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? report_bug+0x1c3/0x1d0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __pfx_amdgpu_device_delay_enable_gfx_off+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? check_flush_dependency+0xfa/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? check_flush_dependency+0xfa/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] __flush_work+0x20a/0x2a0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? try_to_grab_pending+0xb0/0x1b0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __cancel_work+0x39/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __remove_hrtimer+0x39/0x90
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x62/0x80
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl+0xa9/0x120 [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x44/0x60 [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0xe3/0x7b0 [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] amdgpu_job_run+0x93/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x23a/0x3c0 [gpu_sched]
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] process_one_work+0x170/0x380
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] worker_thread+0x294/0x3b0
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] kthread+0xdd/0x110
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] </TASK>
[Tue Dec 31 19:47:55 2024] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This doesn't happen with 6.12.7 - I tried reproducing it w/o the OOT module (loop) by booting once without it, to no avail.
hm. Can't do so today, but will check this in more detail eventually.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 9:42 ` Markus Reichelt
@ 2024-12-31 13:02 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-12-31 22:47 ` Ron Economos
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-12-31 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Vegard Nossum
Hi Greg,
On 30/12/24 21:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 13:02 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-12-31 22:47 ` Ron Economos
2025-01-01 0:34 ` [PATCH 6.12] " Hardik Garg
2025-01-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 6.12 000/114] " Justin Forbes
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-12-31 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 07:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 22:47 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-01-01 0:34 ` Hardik Garg
2025-01-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 6.12 000/114] " Justin Forbes
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-01-01 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel builds fine for v6.12.8-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:41 [PATCH 6.12 000/114] 6.12.8-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-01 0:34 ` [PATCH 6.12] " Hardik Garg
@ 2025-01-01 15:33 ` Justin Forbes
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2025-01-01 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.8 release.
> There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.8-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread