* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-01-30 21:31 ` Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-01-30 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:01:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-01-30 21:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-01-31 5:38 ` Jon Hunter
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-01-30 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 06:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:01:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30 17:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-01-30 21:31 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-01-31 5:38 ` Jon Hunter
2025-01-31 12:57 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-01-31 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:01:36 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:01:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
115 tests: 115 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.128-rc1-gda19df6ebb6c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 5:38 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-01-31 12:57 ` Pavel Machek
2025-01-31 13:57 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-01-31 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1061 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 12:57 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2025-01-31 13:57 ` Ron Economos
2025-01-31 15:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-01-31 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 06:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:01:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 13:57 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-01-31 15:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-01-31 16:58 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-01-31 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 20:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:01:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.128-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: da19df6ebb6c09ded78f67e201f202979c1a5727
* git describe: v6.1.127-50-gda19df6ebb6c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.127-50-gda19df6ebb6c
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.126-65-gad6747190c53)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.126-65-gad6747190c53)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.126-65-gad6747190c53)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.126-65-gad6747190c53)
## Test result summary
total: 108475, pass: 71884, fail: 19274, skip: 16867, xfail: 450
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 139 total, 139 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 31 total, 27 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 30 total, 25 passed, 5 failed
* parisc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 33 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 18 total, 17 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 8 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 15:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-01-31 16:58 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-02-01 8:15 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Hardik Garg
2025-02-01 12:19 ` [PATCH 6.1 00/49] " Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2025-01-31 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 1/30/25 7:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:01:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.128-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
OVERVIEW
Builds: 40 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 593 passed, 0 failed
CI systems: broonie, maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.1.127-50-gda19df6ebb6c
hash: da19df6ebb6c09ded78f67e201f202979c1a5727
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
BUILDS
No build failures found
BOOT TESTS
No boot failures found
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=da19df6ebb6c09ded78f67e201f202979c1a5727&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-01-31 16:58 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2025-02-01 8:15 ` Hardik Garg
2025-02-01 12:19 ` [PATCH 6.1 00/49] " Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-02-01 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.1.128-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review
2025-01-30 14:01 [PATCH 6.1 00/49] 6.1.128-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-01 8:15 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Hardik Garg
@ 2025-02-01 12:19 ` Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-02-01 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 30.01.2025 um 15:01 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.128 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread