The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf v3] bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed
@ 2026-08-03  1:39 Pu Lehui
  2026-08-04 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pu Lehui @ 2026-08-03  1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-kernel
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Martin KaFai Lau,
	Yonghong Song, Song Liu, Jiri Olsa, Emil Tsalapatis, Pu Lehui,
	Pu Lehui

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a
cgroup bpf prog.

This occurs in the following scenario:
1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode.
2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach
   mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or
   update_effective_progs).
3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode.

The reason is that __cgroup_bpf_attach overwrites pl->storage with the
new storage prior to attachment completion. When attachment fails
midway, the cleanup path calls bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage) to
free the newly allocated storage, but fails to restore pl->storage back
to old_storage.

Consequently, the still-active prog1 holds invalid or dangling storage
pointers, leading to an invalid memory access when prog1 executes and
calls bpf_get_local_storage. Additionally, original pl->flags and
cgrp->bpf.flags[atype] are left unrestored.

Fix this by saving old_pl_flags, old_storage, and old_flags prior to the
update, and properly restoring all of them in the cleanup path on error.

Fixes: 7d9c3427894f ("bpf: Make cgroup storages shared between programs on the same cgroup")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
v3:
- Remove confusing commit message. (Emil)
- Add Reviewed-by tag by Emil.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260729100208.3076769-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
- Remove the link relative code as link only support
  BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI attach, so will not occur UAF pl.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260728132336.2857800-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com

 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index e2fa0ebeed83..be24ca453cab 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -813,8 +813,10 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 	struct bpf_prog *old_prog = NULL;
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = {};
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *new_storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = {};
+	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *old_storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = {};
 	struct bpf_prog *new_prog = prog ? : link->link.prog;
 	enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype;
+	u32 old_flags, old_pl_flags;
 	struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
 	struct hlist_head *progs;
 	int err;
@@ -865,6 +867,8 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 
 	if (pl) {
 		old_prog = pl->prog;
+		old_pl_flags = pl->flags;
+		bpf_cgroup_storages_assign(old_storage, pl->storage);
 	} else {
 		pl = kmalloc_obj(*pl);
 		if (!pl) {
@@ -884,6 +888,7 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 	pl->link = link;
 	pl->flags = flags;
 	bpf_cgroup_storages_assign(pl->storage, storage);
+	old_flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
 	cgrp->bpf.flags[atype] = saved_flags;
 
 	if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) {
@@ -915,12 +920,15 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 	if (old_prog) {
 		pl->prog = old_prog;
 		pl->link = NULL;
+		pl->flags = old_pl_flags;
+		bpf_cgroup_storages_assign(pl->storage, old_storage);
 	}
 	bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage);
 	if (!old_prog) {
 		hlist_del(&pl->node);
 		kfree(pl);
 	}
+	cgrp->bpf.flags[atype] = old_flags;
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf v3] bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed
  2026-08-03  1:39 [PATCH bpf v3] bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed Pu Lehui
@ 2026-08-04 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-08-04 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pu Lehui
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor,
	martin.lau, yonghong.song, song, jolsa, emil, pulehui

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Mon,  3 Aug 2026 01:39:34 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> 
> A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a
> cgroup bpf prog.
> 
> This occurs in the following scenario:
> 1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode.
> 2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach
>    mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or
>    update_effective_progs).
> 3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v3] bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6655c409707e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-04 23:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-03  1:39 [PATCH bpf v3] bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed Pu Lehui
2026-08-04 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox