From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, tony@atomide.com
Cc: vdumpa@nvidia.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, sre@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dma-contiguous: do not allocate a single page from CMA area"
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:35:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a3af95a-6e08-01fa-e4ef-07c1c1b6db69@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226202327.5349-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
On 2019-02-26 8:23 pm, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> This reverts commit d222e42e88168fd67e6d131984b86477af1fc256.
>
> The original change breaks omap dss:
> omapdss_dispc 58001000.dispc:
> dispc_errata_i734_wa_init: dma_alloc_writecombine failed
>
> Let's revert it first and then find a safer solution instead.
Ah, I think I see the problem - once arch/arm's __dma_alloc() has
decided to use CMA (because dev_get_cma_area(dev) returns the global
area), it then won't fall back to trying a regular page allocation if
dma_alloc_from_contiguous() returns NULL. Thus anything on 32-bit Arm
trying to allocate a single-page buffer in blockable context with a
CMA-enabled config is just going to fail. Similarly, it looks like none
of the DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS cases are prepared to handle this
change either (amd_iommu appears technically affected, but is already
using dma_alloc_from_contiguous() backwards compared to everyone else, hmm).
I guess the question is whether to add alloc_page()/free_page()
fallbacks to those call sites, or stuff them directly into the CMA
helpers here.
Robin.
> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> ---
> Tony,
>
> Would you please test and verify? Thanks!
>
> kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 22 +++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> index 09074bd04793..b2a87905846d 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> @@ -186,32 +186,16 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base,
> *
> * This function allocates memory buffer for specified device. It uses
> * device specific contiguous memory area if available or the default
> - * global one.
> - *
> - * However, it skips one-page size of allocations from the global area.
> - * As the addresses within one page are always contiguous, so there is
> - * no need to waste CMA pages for that kind; it also helps reduce the
> - * fragmentations in the CMA area. So a caller should be the rebounder
> - * in such case to allocate a normal page upon NULL return value.
> - *
> - * Requires architecture specific dev_get_cma_area() helper function.
> + * global one. Requires architecture specific dev_get_cma_area() helper
> + * function.
> */
> struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, size_t count,
> unsigned int align, bool no_warn)
> {
> - struct cma *cma;
> -
> if (align > CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT)
> align = CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT;
>
> - if (dev && dev->cma_area)
> - cma = dev->cma_area;
> - else if (count > 1)
> - cma = dma_contiguous_default_area;
> - else
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return cma_alloc(cma, count, align, no_warn);
> + return cma_alloc(dev_get_cma_area(dev), count, align, no_warn);
> }
>
> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 20:23 [PATCH] Revert "dma-contiguous: do not allocate a single page from CMA area" Nicolin Chen
2019-02-26 23:35 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-02-27 0:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-02-27 0:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-02-27 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-02-27 14:04 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a3af95a-6e08-01fa-e4ef-07c1c1b6db69@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox