From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
<kernel-team@android.com>, <peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/core: Tweak wait_task_inactive() to force dequeue sched_delayed tasks
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:43:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d6574dd-ece9-4826-95a3-1ce6a84f7d77@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250425195757.2139558-1-jstultz@google.com>
Hello John,
On 4/26/2025 1:27 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> It was reported that in 6.12, smpboot_create_threads() was
> taking much longer then in 6.6.
>
> I narrowed down the call path to:
> smpboot_create_threads()
> -> kthread_create_on_cpu()
> -> kthread_bind()
> -> __kthread_bind_mask()
> ->wait_task_inactive()
>
> Where in wait_task_inactive() we were regularly hitting the
> queued case, which sets a 1 tick timeout, which when called
> multiple times in a row, accumulates quickly into a long
> delay.
>
> I noticed disabling the DELAY_DEQUEUE sched feature recovered
> the performance, and it seems the newly create tasks are usually
> sched_delayed and left on the runqueue.
>
> So in wait_task_inactive() when we see the task
> p->se.sched_delayed, manually dequeue the sched_delayed task
> with DEQUEUE_DELAYED, so we don't have to constantly wait a
> tick.
>
> This seems to work, but I've only lightly tested it, so I'd love
> close review and feedback in case I've missed something in
> wait_task_inactive(), or if there is a simpler alternative
> approach.
>
> NOTE: Peter did highlight[1] his general distaste for the
> kthread_bind() through wait_task_inactive() functions, which
> suggests a deeper rework might be better, but I'm not familiar
> enough with all its users to have a sense of how that might be
> done, and this fix seems to address the problem and be more
> easily backported to 6.12-stable, so I wanted to submit it
> again, as a potentially more short-term solution.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250422085628.GA14170@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Reported-by: peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com
Perhaps a Fixes tag to help with backporting:
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
other than thank, feel free to include:
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>> ---
> v2:
> * Rework & simplify the check as suggested by K Prateek Nayak
> * Added Reported-by tag for proper attribution
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c81cf642dba05..b986cd2fb19b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2283,6 +2283,12 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
> * just go back and repeat.
> */
> rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
> + /*
> + * If task is sched_delayed, force dequeue it, to avoid always
> + * hitting the tick timeout in the queued case
> + */
> + if (p->se.sched_delayed)
> + dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
> trace_sched_wait_task(p);
> running = task_on_cpu(rq, p);
> queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 19:57 [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/core: Tweak wait_task_inactive() to force dequeue sched_delayed tasks John Stultz
2025-04-28 5:13 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d6574dd-ece9-4826-95a3-1ce6a84f7d77@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox