From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/core: Tweak wait_task_inactive() to force dequeue sched_delayed tasks
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:57:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250425195757.2139558-1-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
It was reported that in 6.12, smpboot_create_threads() was
taking much longer then in 6.6.
I narrowed down the call path to:
smpboot_create_threads()
-> kthread_create_on_cpu()
-> kthread_bind()
-> __kthread_bind_mask()
->wait_task_inactive()
Where in wait_task_inactive() we were regularly hitting the
queued case, which sets a 1 tick timeout, which when called
multiple times in a row, accumulates quickly into a long
delay.
I noticed disabling the DELAY_DEQUEUE sched feature recovered
the performance, and it seems the newly create tasks are usually
sched_delayed and left on the runqueue.
So in wait_task_inactive() when we see the task
p->se.sched_delayed, manually dequeue the sched_delayed task
with DEQUEUE_DELAYED, so we don't have to constantly wait a
tick.
This seems to work, but I've only lightly tested it, so I'd love
close review and feedback in case I've missed something in
wait_task_inactive(), or if there is a simpler alternative
approach.
NOTE: Peter did highlight[1] his general distaste for the
kthread_bind() through wait_task_inactive() functions, which
suggests a deeper rework might be better, but I'm not familiar
enough with all its users to have a sense of how that might be
done, and this fix seems to address the problem and be more
easily backported to 6.12-stable, so I wanted to submit it
again, as a potentially more short-term solution.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250422085628.GA14170@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Reported-by: peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v2:
* Rework & simplify the check as suggested by K Prateek Nayak
* Added Reported-by tag for proper attribution
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c81cf642dba05..b986cd2fb19b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2283,6 +2283,12 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
* just go back and repeat.
*/
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
+ /*
+ * If task is sched_delayed, force dequeue it, to avoid always
+ * hitting the tick timeout in the queued case
+ */
+ if (p->se.sched_delayed)
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
trace_sched_wait_task(p);
running = task_on_cpu(rq, p);
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
--
2.49.0.850.g28803427d3-goog
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 19:57 John Stultz [this message]
2025-04-28 5:13 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/core: Tweak wait_task_inactive() to force dequeue sched_delayed tasks K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250425195757.2139558-1-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter-yc.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox